AccessMyLibrary : Search Information that Libraries Trust AccessMyLibrary | News, Research, and Information that Libraries Trust

AccessMyLibrary    Browse    M    Medium Aevum    SEP-02    The ending of Chaucer's Nun's Priest's Tale.

The ending of Chaucer's Nun's Priest's Tale.

Publication: Medium Aevum

Publication Date: 22-SEP-02

Author: Field, P.J.C.
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.

Bookmark this article

Print this article

Link to this article

Email this article

Digg It!

Add to del.icio.us

RSS

COPYRIGHT 2002 Society for the Study of Mediaeval Languages and Literature

The last three lines of the Nun's Priest's Tale contain an interpretative crux. (1) The Nun's Priest says that even those who do not like his tale can benefit from it, because, as St Paul says, everything that is written is written for our doctrine (Romans xv.4). That formula had achieved proverbial status in Chaucer's time because of the strength of the contemporary sense that the world was intelligibly analogical. Events on earth had parallels in the heavens, prophetic events in the Old Testament could be retrospectively understood from the New, and St Paul had said (or could be taken as saying) that divine providence had seen to it that moral good could be derived, not only from writings that were manifestly sacred or inspired, but from every text without exception. For Chaucer, the importance of the `everything that is written' formula clearly went well beyond the characterization of the Nun's Priest: it is central to the Retractions with which he ended the Canterbury Tales.

When the Nun's Priest has said this, he, like most of the Canterbury pilgrims, closes his tale with a prayer. His prayer runs:

Now, goode god, if that it be thy wille, As seith my lord, so make us alle good men; And bring us to his heighe blisse! Amen.

The problem is the referent of `my lord'. (2) In Chaucer's time, my lord could be used as a vocative of courtesy to an interlocutor, or qualified by a further phrase (my lord of Norfolk, my lord of Canterbury); otherwise, in Chaucer's writing and generally, it normally implied a relationship with a superior that is immediate, personal, and in some way exclusive. (3) The only relationship of that kind that the Canterbury Tales show the Nun's Priest having is with the Prioress.

As a result, readers since Chaucer's time have looked for a suitable my lord among Chaucer's historical male contemporaries. Several early scribes glossed the phrase as referring to the Archbishop of Canterbury, who at the time of the composition of the Nun's Priest's Tale would have been William...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.


More Articles from Medium Aevum
Further evidence for Chaucer's representation of the Pardoner as a wom...
September 22, 2002
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in ...
September 22, 2002
Lynne Long, Translating the Bible from the 7th to the 17th Century.(Bo...
September 22, 2002
Kathleen L. Scott, Later Gothic Manuscripts 1390-1490.(Book Review)
September 22, 2002
David Salter, Holy and Noble Beasts: Encounters with Animals in Mediev...
September 22, 2002

What's on AccessMyLibrary?

31,982,826 articles
in the following categories:

Arts, Business, Consumer News, Culture & Society, Education, Government, Personal Interest, Health, News, Science & Technology


© 2008 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning  | All Rights Reserved | About this Service | About The Gale Group, a part of Cengage Learning
                                            Privacy Policy | Site Map | Content Licensing | Contact Us | Link to us
      Other Gale sites: Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever.com | WiseTo Social Issues