AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
An assistant news editor of the Lancaster Sunday Times (lancasteronline.org, 4/2/2005) had this to say: "The Schiavo case was wrenchingly complex, with no easy answers. But to the extremists, the answers are easy." In case you wondered: the "extremists" are "social conservatives" and the "cultural right" who think that an innocent person shouldn't be executed by starvation.
Where is the "complexity" in the tragic case of Terri Schindler Schiavo?
* Terri Schiavo was a disabled person, but she was not dying. To say, as the many defenders of her killing did, that "she should be allowed to die" or that we should "let her die" was not a matter of recognizing "complexity" but of misrepresenting her status.
* Terri Schiavo was guilty of no crime. Attorneys for Schiavo's parents and siblings argued before federal district judge James Whitemore that killing Terri Schiavo by starvation amounted to "cruel and unusual punishment," in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Judge Whitemore ruled that the protection of that amendment was unavailable to Mrs. Schiavo--because she was no criminal.
Had Mrs. Schiavo been a serial killer, any judicial ruling condemning her to death by starvation would have been immediately overturned on appeal. And the judge imposing such a sentence would have seen his career end in shame. But of course, there is the "complexity" of the case--where wrong is right, and the "judicial process" results in injustice.
Had a man in Pinellas County, Florida, killed his pet dog by slow starvation over 13 days, he would now be facing a prison sentence. And the papers and airwaves would be full of indignation about the sheer inhumanity of it. Terri Schiavo, however, was a human being--making her eligible for a "private" killing.
* Terri Schiavo was the victim of a shoddy legal process. Much has been made of the numerous appellate reviews and rulings in the Schiavo case. "The law was followed," we are told. How can "following the law" result in the legally sanctioned private and cruel execution of an obviously innocent person?
Source: HighBeam Research, FROM THE PRESIDENT; DEATH BY CRUEL AND UNUSUAL "JUSTICE".(Editorial)