AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Are congregations constrained by government? Empirical results from the National Congregations Study.(Statistical Data Included)

Journal of Church and State

| March 22, 2000 | Chaves, Mark; Tsitsos, William | COPYRIGHT 1999 J.M. Dawson Studies in Church and State. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) became law in 1993. It prohibited government from "substantially burdening" a person's exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability unless the government can demonstrate that the burden furthers "a compelling governmental interest" and "is the least restrictive means of furthering that ... interest."(1) Its purpose was to expand religious freedom beyond the bounds articulated in the 1990 Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith decision.(2) The RFRA generated hundreds of lawsuits until it was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. Flores (1997).(3) Efforts to revive the RFRA, or legislation similar to it, are ongoing. Congress held hearings on the Religious Liberty Protection Act of 1998, and the current Congress is considering the 1999 Religious Liberty Protection Act (RLPA), bills supported by many of the same religious and civil liberties groups that backed the RFRA. Moreover, legislatures in at least six states--Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Rhode Island, and Texas--have enacted their own state versions in response to the Boerne decision.

Debate about the RFRA proceeded along several fronts. One important subject of debate concerned the RFRA's proportionality relative to the dangers it is intended to remedy. Proponents of the RFRA argued that religious freedom is sufficiently threatened that a mechanism as powerful as the RFRA is necessary to protect it. This argument is present in congressional testimony and debate concerning the RFRA. Rep. Maloney from New York, for instance, stated that "the fundamental right of all Americans to the free exercise of religion is in serious jeopardy.... [T]he Supreme Court's ruling in Employment Division versus Smith has already begun to chip away at the first freedom protected by the Bill of Rights, the freedom of religion."(4) Rep. Hoyer from Maryland, meanwhile, cited the remark of a Minnesota judge that "churches have no more constitutional rights than adult movie theaters."(5) Expressing concern for followers of less popular religions, New Jersey's Rep. Franks asserted that the implications of the Smith decision "are especially burdensome for those whose beliefs lie within the religious minority."(6)

This argument also is present in scholarly writing. For instance, Robert Drinan wrote that "denials of building permits to churches are not uncommon in America." Later in the same piece, Drinan asked, "What will happen to religious individuals and persons if the RFRA is not reinstated in some form? The problem is that no one will ever know. At the local level, zoning commissions will quietly deny access to Jewish temples, controversial denominations, or Catholic schools."(7)

In striking down the RFRA, however, the Supreme Court ruled that the Act was out of proportion to the threat posed to religious freedom. Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy asserted that "while preventive rules are sometimes appropriate remedial measures, there must be a congruence between the means used and the ends to be achieved. The appropriateness of remedial measures must be considered in light of the evil presented."(8) Justice Kennedy continued by declaring that "RFRA is so out of proportion to a supposed remedial or preventive object that the RFRA cannot be understood as responsive to, or designed to prevent, unconstitutional behavior and, instead, the RFRA appears to attempt a substantive change in constitutional protections."(9)

According to Justice Kennedy, the heavy additional burden placed by the RFRA on states--indicated by the hundreds of lawsuits filed under the RFRA--was out of proportion to the protection that it provided. In his words, "the substantial costs which the RFRA exacts through its stringent…

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Counting heads on RFRA. (Religious Freedom Restoration Act)
Magazine article from: Constitutional Commentary Paulsen, Michael Stokes March 22, 1997 700+ words
...constitutionality of "RFRA" -- the Religious Freedom Restoration Act...My prediction: RFRA will be upheld, without...constitutionality of RFRA is one of those rare...uninitiated. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act...
Religious regulation and the courts: documenting the effects of Smith and...
Magazine article from: Journal of Church and State Adamczyk, Amy Wybraniec, John Finke, Roger March 22, 2004 700+ words
...coalition proposed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). A legislative act...assesses the influence of RFRA and the ability of RFRA to counteract the Smith...the United States. I. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE SMITH DECISION...
The global dimension of RFRA. (Religious Freedom Restoration Act)
Magazine article from: Constitutional Commentary Neuman, Gerald L. March 22, 1997 700+ words
...constitutionality of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),(1) the federal...such a challenge to RFRA in its current term...religious liberty. Religious freedom is a matter of international...of authority for RFRA, or for a RFRA...
The Reincarnation of RFRA.(Religious Freedom Restoration Act)
Newspaper article from: Free Inquiry Flynn, Tom December 22, 2000 700+ words
...latest incarnation of 1993's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), designed to broaden free...Division v. Smith (1990). RFRA was overturned by the Supreme...Texas church's claim that RFRA made it exempt from local zoning...
U.S. Appeals Court: RFRA- Religious Freedom Restoration Act VISITS.(prisoners...
Magazine article from: Corrections Caselaw Quarterly May 1, 2001 700+ words
...rights and violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) because prison officials had...rights. According to the court, RFRA remains constitutional as applied...governments and that the portions of RFRA that were found unconstitutional...
RFRA. (Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993)(Symposium: Reflections on...
Magazine article from: William and Mary Law Review Currie, David P. February 1, 1998 700+ words
...strict neutrality standard of religious freedom Justice Scalia laid down...rule of law raised by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)(3)--there could be...18) Thus, the case for RFRA stands and falls with the...
Antidisestablishmentarianism: why RFRA really was unconstitutional. (Religious...
Magazine article from: Michigan Law Review Rubenfeld, Jed August 1, 1997 700+ words
...Supreme Court struck down the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),(1) handing down its...in fifty years. Through RFRA, Congress had prohibited any...governmental interest."(2) RFRA was a response to Employment...
U.S. Appeals Court: EQUAL PROTECTION RFRA-Religious Freedom Restoration Act...
Magazine article from: Corrections Caselaw Quarterly May 1, 2000 700+ words
...possession of crosses. The district court found that the regulation violated the provisions of the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (RFRA) and the appeals court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded...
RFRA: more harm than good. (Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993)
Magazine article from: Corrections Today Wilson, James C. June 1, 1996 700+ words
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is...jury is out on whether RFRA makes sense for society...out: "Ironically, RFRA was enacted to protect religious freedom and practices. Because...opportunities." Now that RFRA has been on the books...
Restoring religious freedom to the workplace: Title VII, RFRA and religious...
Magazine article from: University of Pennsylvania Law Review Rosenzweig, Sidney A. June 1, 1996 700+ words
...violate the law.(20) The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 ("RFRA") prohibits the Government...interest.(21) Although RFRA does not directly modify the...will have substantial effect. RFRA creates a presumption that...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, Are congregations constrained by government? Empirical results from...

©2010 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily