AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

McCain-Feingold Passes, Broad Coalition Takes Law to Court.(Bi-partisan Campaign Reform Act)(John McCain)(Russell Feingold)(Brief Article)

National Right to Life News

| April 01, 2002 | COPYRIGHT 2002 National Right to Life Committee, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

WASHINGTON -- Within hours of its passage, "campaign finance reform" legislation that places substantial new restrictions on free speech about politicians was challenged in court. The National Right to Life Committee is among many citizen groups to file legal challenges to the so-called "Bi-partisan Campaign Reform Act," popularly referred to as "McCain-Feingold." Unless struck down by the federal courts, most of its restrictions will take effect after the November 5 general election.

As NRL News goes to press, opposition continues to grow. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) held a press conference April 10 to announce that nearly two dozen additional co-plaintiffs have joined the challenge he brought against the law. The coalition which includes National Right to Life, ranges from the ACLU on the left, to the Christian Coalition on the right.

The suit was filed in the only court where the act said a suit could be brought -- the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Congress also specified that the appeal from the district court will skip the court of appeals and go directly to the United States Supreme Court. The case is expected to move rapidly to the Supreme Court.

The legislation became law after a six-year effort led by Senators John McCain (R- Az.) and Russell Feingold (D-Wi.) in the Senate, and Reps. Chris Shays (R-Ct.) and Marty Meehan (D-Mass.) in the House. NRLC was among many citizen groups to strongly oppose the legislation. Congressional opposition was led by Senator McConnell (R-Ky.) and Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tx.), among others.

The House of Representatives approved the bill (H.R. 2356) on February 14, 240- 189. (See March NRL News, page 1.) Senate approval, by a vote of 60-40, followed on March 20. (See roll call, page 31.)

President Bush signed the bill into law on March 27. The same day, James Bopp, Jr., NRLC general counsel, and other lawyers for Senator McConnell filed suit.

NRLC joined the suit to defend its right to broadcast issue advertisements that tell voters where candidates stand on pro-life issues. "This law simply but effectively gags citizen groups such as NRLC," Bopp explained. "If NRLC can't, for example, describe partial-birth abortion and say that a candidate supports it, the public won't get that information from the networks! This law is a direct assault on our ability to get our message out."

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
It's the Economy ... NO, THE SUPREME COURT!(United States Supreme Court and the...
Magazine article from: National Right to Life News March 1, 2008 700+ words
...Why the Dems lack Supreme Court nominees," 2/27...elections loser becoming a Supreme Court justice would try our...prayer: "God Save the United States and this Honorable...abortionist to the Supreme Court should keep in mind...
U.S. Supreme Court: United States v. Navajo Nation.
Newspaper article from: Daily Record (Baltimore, MD) April 27, 2009 700+ words
...sovereign immunity. CASE: United States v. Navajo Nation...Breyer & Alito). United States v. Navajo Nation...compensation...fails. United States v. Navajo Nation...over tribal coal. The Supreme Court granted certiorari...
U.S. Supreme Court: United States v. Hayes.
Newspaper article from: Daily Record (Baltimore, MD) March 16, 2009 700+ words
...element, the existence of a domestic relationship. CASE: United States v. Hayes, S. Ct. No. 07-608 (decided Feb. 24, 2009...a domestic relationship between offender and victim. The Supreme Court granted the government's petition for a writ of certiorari...
In the Supreme Court of United States: Unisys Corporation, Petitioner, v....
Magazine article from: Tax Executive July 1, 2003 700+ words
...petitioners with the Supreme Court of the United States in Unisys Corporation...ease provides the Supreme Court with an opportunity...corporations in the United States, Canada, and...affected by the Supreme Court's decision whether...
Peabody Energy Responds to U.S. Supreme Court Ruling: United States Versus The...
Press release article from: PR Newswire March 4, 2003 700+ words
...believes today's U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States versus the Navajo Nation...decision, the U.S. Supreme Court rejects the Navajo Nation...agreements. The U.S. Supreme Court also found there was no...
Ties in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Magazine article from: William and Mary Law Review Hartnett, Edward A. December 1, 2002 700+ words
...on a tie vote by the Supreme Court of the United States. (10) The New Jersey...involved. (11) The United States Supreme Court decision in Beazley...traditional practice of the Supreme Court of the United States and respond to various...
ACLJ Says Senate Questionnaire Shows Harriet Miers is Uniquely Qualified to...
Press release article from: Business Wire October 18, 2005 700+ words
...questionnaire completed by Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers clearly...Harriet Miers for a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States," said Jay Sekulow, Chief...representing clients before the Supreme Court. With her conservative judicial...
Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: the International...
Magazine article from: Georgetown Journal of International Law Kadish, Mark J. September 22, 2004 700+ words
...2003, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari...jurisprudence in the United States. In light...decision, the Supreme Court may find the...the case of United States v. Ortiz noted that the Supreme Court had previously...
Driving while Mexican: why the Supreme Court must reexamine United States v....
Magazine article from: Houston Journal of International Law Gowie, Renata Ann January 1, 2001 700+ words
...patrol jurisprudence, given the changed demographics of the southwestern United States. II. SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT In 1975, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Brignoni-Ponce held that a roving border patrol may stop vehicles...
Why me? (First Arguments at the Supreme Court of the United States)
Magazine article from: Journal of Appellate Practice and Process Dellinger, Walter March 22, 2003 700+ words
...asked to write about my first Supreme Court argument, I wondered what...never argued a case in the Supreme Court, or been responsible for...responsible for a case in the United States Supreme Court intimidated me. And I knew...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, McCain-Feingold Passes, Broad Coalition Takes Law to...

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA