AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
In an important free speech case, Wisconsin Right to Life filed a lawsuit July 28, challenging a federal law passed year that restricts the group's right to run radio and TV ads urging supporters to contact their U.S. senators about ongoing filibusters of President Bush's judicial nominees.
The lawsuit, the first of its kind, was filed against the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The suit stems from the McCain-Feingold "campaign finance reform" bill that was upheld last year by the U.S. Supreme Court. The law bans labor unions and corporations from mentioning a candidate's name in broadcast ads 30 days before a primary and 60 days before a general election.
On December 3, the High Court upheld the broadcast ban against a facial challenge. (A "facial challenge" asks that a law be struck down in its entirety.)
However, the justices left open the possibility "that the broadcast ban would be unconstitutional as applied to certain types of ads," according to Barbara Lyons, executive director of Wisconsin Right to Life (WRL). "Wisconsin Right to Life is the first organization in the country to file suit in federal court claiming that the broadcast ban is unconstitutional as applied - - in this instance, to grassroots lobbying advertisements," she told NRL News.
WRL is currently running radio and television ads encouraging pro-lifers to call Democratic Senators Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl to ask them to oppose the filibusters against President Bush's judicial nominees. These votes are expected to take place in September.
Since Feingold's name will be on the ballot in a September 14 primary election, the law prohibits WRL from using Feingold's name in the television ads after mid-August. In its lawsuit, WRL is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to issue an injunction allowing the pro-life group to run these ads during the blackout period.
"The broadcast ban wrongly restricts citizens' ability to learn about and influence an upcoming vote in Congress," Lyons told NRL News. "We want to restore free speech rights ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Wisconsin Right to Life Lawsuit Challenges Speech Restrictions.