AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
A New Year's Day article appearing in the Washington Post provides an insightful glance into the themes pro-death forces are using to deflect mounting criticism of Oregon's unique-in-the-nation law that legalizes lethal prescriptions to assist suicide.
The nearly three-page long article praising Oregon's law, written by the Post's Susan Okie, is set against the backdrop of a fierce legal battle being fought in the courts. In a November 6 letter sent to the Drug Enforcement Agency, Attorney General John Ashcroft effectively reversed a 1998 decision by then-Attorney General Janet Reno that prohibited the DEA from enforcing federal drug control laws against doctors who prescribed lethal dosages under cover of Oregon's assisted suicide law.
The state of Oregon, along with the pro-euthanasia organization Compassion in Dying, immediately appealed to U.S. District Judge Robert Jones. On November 20, Jones allowed Oregon's law to remain in effect while he reviews legal briefs from all parties and sorts out the legal issues. NRLC and Oregon RTL filed a "friend-of-the-court brief" which defended Ashcroft's legal reasoning.
According to public opinion polls, sympathy for legalizing assisted suicide is strongest if a patient is suffering untreatable pain. However, modern medicine's ability to control pain is so effective that current pain was not given as a reason by any of those who received legal lethal prescriptions in 2000, the most recent year for which official reports in Oregon are available.
So physician-assisted suicide is now being sold, even more than ever, as a way of asserting control--as an exercise of "autonomy."
"Among people in Oregon who have used the law to end their lives, it appears the most common motive was a desire for autonomy," according to the Post. "Knowing that assisted suicide is an option... seems to comfort some sick people by offering a measure of personal choice ...."
Okie used Richard Holmes, who has received but not yet taken a lethal prescription to make her argument. Holmes' told the Post, "I've lived my life the way I want to. I should die the way I want to." Indeed, Holmes believes this should be the law "in every state in the whole country."
Source: HighBeam Research, Euthanasia Apologists Mount Campaign to Whitewash Oregon Law.