AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Voices from NRLC 2008.(National Right to Life Committee)

National Right to Life News

| July 01, 2008 | COPYRIGHT 2008 National Right to Life Committee, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

NRLC President Dr. Wanda Franz -- According to conventional wisdom, elections are always about the voters' pocketbooks. That, of course doesn't exclude the other, actual issues from being of much greater consequence. Yes, oil prices are high; but oil prices come and go. And taxes go up and down. But this election is foremost about the United States Supreme Court. Whoever wins the presidential election will determine the character of the Court for decades, yes decades! Should the next president make bad decisions about economic policy, the voters will ultimately express their displeasure, and the policies will change accordingly. Mistakes in appointing Supreme Court justices are a different matter altogether. It can take decades to correct such mistakes, as we all found out. That is why we still have to work in the pro-life vineyard, 35 years after Roe and Doe.

Former Senator Fred Thompson -- I don't know how to put it any plainer: If Senator Obama is elected, he will, through Supreme Court and federal court nominations, cause this trend to accelerate. And that will bring about harmful changes in this country that no one in this room will want to see and no one in this room will live long enough to see rectified. During his brief time in the U.S. Senate, the senator strongly opposed the nomination of Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. And without a doubtdespite what he may sayhe would continue to follow the agenda of those who have enabled his meteoric rise: MoveOn.org, the NEA, NARAL, and the remnants of the 1960s radical left that failed then, but sees the opportunity for one last gasp.

From President George W. Bush's video message -- Our nation's Declaration of Independence promises that all people have an unalienable right to life. It states that this right comes from our creator. And that government exists to secure the rights of its citizens. For the past eight years my administration has proudly stood with you to ensure that our nation lives up to this noble promise. ... For eight years we have stood together to defend the principle that every human life has value. I thank all of you for your support, and I join you in looking forward to the day when every child is welcomed in life, and protected in law.

Former Bush White House Senior Advisor Karl Rove -- Now this is a man [Sen. Barack Obama] who stands up and says he is going to bring Republicans and Democrats together, conservatives and liberals together, to achieve great things for the country. If you want to bring the nation together, how can you claim to do that, if you are at the same time supporting the indefensible practice of using taxpayers' dollars to fund abortion? You can't! You can not square that circle. You can not do that and live up to the promise that you made to bring the country together. ... If we believe in a culture of life ... we must use the power that we have as individuals, with people who depend on us for advice and counsel, to make the quiet and persuasive case that every child ought to be welcomed in life and protected in law. Thank you for all that you do for our cause. May God bless the United States of America.

Virginia Attorney General Bob McDonnell -- It is the solemn duty of us in elected office to protect those enumerated, fundamental rights [found in ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
It's the Economy ... NO, THE SUPREME COURT!(United States Supreme Court and the...
Magazine article from: National Right to Life News March 1, 2008 700+ words
...Why the Dems lack Supreme Court nominees," 2/27...elections loser becoming a Supreme Court justice would try our...prayer: "God Save the United States and this Honorable...abortionist to the Supreme Court should keep in mind...
JUSTICES OF SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES
News wire article from: US Fed News Service, Including US State News September 19, 2009 700+ words
...Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States Stamps First-Day...Lower Great Hall The Supreme Court of the United States Note: The Chief...issue Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, a pane of four...
In the Supreme Court of United States: Unisys Corporation, Petitioner, v....
Magazine article from: Tax Executive July 1, 2003 700+ words
...petitioners with the Supreme Court of the United States in Unisys Corporation...ease provides the Supreme Court with an opportunity...corporations in the United States, Canada, and...affected by the Supreme Court's decision whether...
Peabody Energy Responds to U.S. Supreme Court Ruling: United States Versus The...
Press release article from: PR Newswire March 4, 2003 700+ words
...believes today's U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States versus the Navajo Nation...decision, the U.S. Supreme Court rejects the Navajo Nation...agreements. The U.S. Supreme Court also found there was no...
Ties in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Magazine article from: William and Mary Law Review Hartnett, Edward A. December 1, 2002 700+ words
...on a tie vote by the Supreme Court of the United States. (10) The New Jersey...involved. (11) The United States Supreme Court decision in Beazley...traditional practice of the Supreme Court of the United States and respond to various...
ACLJ Says Senate Questionnaire Shows Harriet Miers is Uniquely Qualified to...
Press release article from: Business Wire October 18, 2005 700+ words
...questionnaire completed by Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers clearly...Harriet Miers for a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States," said Jay Sekulow, Chief...representing clients before the Supreme Court. With her conservative judicial...
Driving while Mexican: why the Supreme Court must reexamine United States v....
Magazine article from: Houston Journal of International Law Gowie, Renata Ann January 1, 2001 700+ words
...patrol jurisprudence, given the changed demographics of the southwestern United States. II. SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT In 1975, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Brignoni-Ponce held that a roving border patrol may stop vehicles...
St. James Church's Legal Battle over Its Property Moving to United States...
Newspaper article from: Telecommunications Weekly July 8, 2009 700+ words
...certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. St. James is...the California Supreme Court's interpretation...Amendment of the United States Constitution...affiliation. A United States Supreme Court decision in favor...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, Voices from NRLC 2008.(National Right to Life Committee)

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA