AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Reviving the Constitution: Thomas E. Woods and Kevin R.C. Gutzman's important book Who Killed the Constitution? chronicles the Supreme Court's attacks on the Constitution.(Book review)

The New American

| September 15, 2008 | McManus, John F. | COPYRIGHT 2008 American Opinion Publishing, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Who Killed the Constitution?: The Fate of American Liberty from World War I to George W. Bush, by Thomas E. Woods and Kevin R.C. Gutzman, New York: Random House/Crown Forum, 2008, 259 pages, hardcover.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Dr. Thomas Woods is a prolific writer who is perhaps best known for writing the first of the "Politically Incorrect Guide ..." books in the popular series published by Regnery. His 2004 treatise about American history appeared on the New York Times best-seller list and its success spawned a full bookshelf of imitators issuing additional "Guides."

He has now teamed up with Western Connecticut State University American history professor Kevin Gutzman in the 259-page Who Killed the Constitution? While there is much valuable and suppressed history in the book, its title is disconcerting. The Constitution is certainly under attack, but to claim it is "killed" is an unnecessary stretch. The conclusion these two Ph.D.s have reached in their title is emphasized and repeated. Early in their book they write, "The Constitution is already dead. It died a long time ago." And they begin their concluding chapter by saying: "The Constitution is dead. That blunt but unavoidable truth should be clear by now."

Is there no hope whatsoever? The authors explain, "Thomas Jefferson ... knew that if the federal government had a monopoly on constitutional interpretation, it would naturally read the Constitution in its own favor. He insisted that the states ... were entitled to make constitutional determinations, because the only alternative was a central government monopoly that in the end would swallow up the states." Because they see states' rights as dead, they maintain there is hardly a glimmer of hope that the Constitution retains some life.

However, they do actually offer a faint glimmer. In the book's final paragraph, we read: "Nonetheless, the Constitution can still serve a purpose, as it remains a useful bludgeon to employ against government power grabs. By calling attention to what the Constitution really says, we can alert the people to just how consistently and dramatically their fundamental law has been betrayed. What they do with that knowledge is up to the American people themselves to decide." (Emphasis added.) In other words, the people can still ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
A Credible Supreme Court The Guardian of our Constitution and Defender of...
Newspaper article from: Manila Bulletin June 11, 2006 700+ words
...Under the 1973 Constitution, the membership of the Supreme Court was increased...The 1973 Constitution also vested in the Supreme Court administrative...trust. The Supreme Court is the Guardian of our Constitution and Defender...
Federalism and the Florida Constitution: the self-inflicted wounds of...
Magazine article from: Albany Law Review Marks, Thomas C., Jr. March 22, 2003 700+ words
...the Florida Supreme Court--to interpret...the Florida Constitution's Declaration...the Federal Constitution as interpreted...the U.S. Supreme Court. (4) Both...United States Constitution, as interpreted...United States Supreme Court. Articles...
Constitutionalism 101: most people think that the Supreme Court has the final...
Magazine article from: The New American Krey, Patrick May 25, 2009 700+ words
...than the notion that the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution. Referring to the Supreme Court as the ultimate arbiter...Marshall establishes the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of the Constitution. This role, as it is...
Dangers of "judicial supremacy": the Supreme Court has perverted its role of...
Magazine article from: The New American Vieira, Edwin, Jr. March 2, 2009 700+ words
...opinion of the Supreme Court determines...meaning of the Constitution as to the...opinion of the Supreme Court or by a formal...amendment of the Constitution (the meaning...establish this Constitution for the United...America." The Supreme Court itself has...
ACLJ Calls on Supreme Court to Follow Constitution and Permit President to Act...
Press release article from: Business Wire April 26, 2004 700+ words
...the U.S. Supreme Court should follow the Constitution and permit...authority. The Supreme Court has a sound...it's the Constitution. It is our...abides by the Constitution in these...cases." The Supreme Court will hear...
Looking at the constitution through world-colored glasses: the Supreme Court's...
Magazine article from: Houston Journal of International Law Racusin, Philip D. March 22, 2006 700+ words
...discourse. (16) The Supreme Court's use of such law...Comment will explore the Supreme Court's historical practices...intergovernmental unions now have constitution-reviewing courts...those dealt with by the Supreme Court. The Court should...
The Intelligible Constitution: The Supreme Court's Obligation to Maintain the...
Magazine article from: Michigan Law Review Mikva, Abner J. May 1, 1993 700+ words
...predict how the Supreme Court is going to interpret the Constitution and its broad...that the Supreme Court is doing...interpreting the Constitution - not because...body of the Constitution and the limitations...Rights. The Supreme Court, and to...
The Constitution and punishment.(how Supreme Court dealt with constitutional...
Magazine article from: Stanford Law Review Chemerinsky, Erwin April 1, 2004 700+ words
...THEORY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND PUNISHMENT...March 2003, the Supreme Court, in Lockyer...State Farm, the Supreme Court granted certiorari...not violate the Constitution but too much...questions: Is the Supreme Court consistent in...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA