AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
I WAS THE AUSTRALIAN Ambassador to Burma from 1980 to 1982 during the rule of President U Ne Win. A recent visit to Burma enabled me to make some comparisons with conditions there then and now.
I do not believe the political situation is any worse than it was in 1980-82 or at any other time during Ne Win's rule. At no time were there any representative institutions, freedom of the press or expression or even freedom of thought. "How can one man [Ne Win] hold an entire country in absolute thraldom?" the Sri Lankan ambassador asked me when I called on him in 1980. Neither he nor I had any answer to this question. There were political prisoners then just as there are now, with the difference that one of them now is world-famous and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate.
One of Ne Win's favourite tricks was to arrest suddenly and imprison those closest to him, the most notable example being General Tin Oo, the head of military intelligence who, before his arrest in the early 1980s, was considered the second-most powerful man in the country. Those who are now writing articles and conducting seminars to denounce the lack of democracy in Burma should have been doing so thirty or forty years ago.
The current junta has maintained Ne Win's tight grip. I met no one in Burma during my recent visit who expected any change in the political scene. The generals are determined to retain power, and with the support of China, Thailand and India will probably do so. "All we ask," one Burmese said to me, "is for our rights as citizens to be respected and to get protection from the government." They are getting neither of these. If anyone gets into trouble with the law, his fate depends entirely on whomever he knows that has influence.
I was shocked when a young man struck up a conversation with me in an internet cafe. "The government is inefficient and corrupt," he said. "Cronyism [a word I heard everywhere in Burma] is rampant. My father retired last year after thirty years as a headmaster and now has nothing. I have no prospects. The health system is in an absolute shambles." If any official had overheard this conversation, the young man would certainly have been arrested; I might even have been arrested myself. It is faintly possible that the population will be so disgusted with the junta's behaviour after the cyclone that they will rise against it, but I would not count on this. They know the cards are stacked against them. There is little possibility of political change.
What has changed, however, and for the better, is the intellectual and economic situation. During Ne Win's regime, all economic activity was undertaken and controlled--very inefficiently and incompetently--by the government, and no foreign firms were allowed to operate in Burma. The most any private citizen could do was to open a restaurant, a backyard plastics factory or a laundry. Very few Burmese could travel overseas because of tight foreign exchange regulations. All this has changed. Many Burmese have now gone into business ...
Source: HighBeam Research, The Burmese prospect.