AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Minnesota Gov. Pawlenty Vetoes Pro-Cloning Bill.(Tim Pawlenty vetoes Kahn-Cohen Cloning Bill )

National Right to Life News

| June 01, 2008 | COPYRIGHT 2008 National Right to Life Committee, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Pro-lifers in Minnesota turned back still another "clone and kill" proposal when pro-life Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty vetoed a measure sponsored by two Democrats, State Rep. Phyllis Kahn and State Sen. Richard Cohen. While the veto could not be overridden because the legislative session has ended, Pawlenty took the issue so seriously he took the time to carefully elaborate his objections and his alternatives.

S.F. 100 was approved last year in the Senate and in the House this month. The measure would not only have authorized the University of Minnesota to spend millions of dollars of state money on human embryonic stem cell research, it would also have required that researchers face felony charges if they did not destroy the human clones.

As per usual the bill was wrapped in assurances that nothing "unethical" would have been authorized because there would be an "oversight committee." Pawlenty, however, was not fooled.

In his message, he reiterated that he "support[s] stem cell research that is consistent with sound ethical and moral standards." Pawlenty then offered a specific list of acceptable alternatives which many have argued are both uncontroversial and much more likely to result in benefits to patients.

Noting that stem cell research is "evolving rapidly," Pawlenty touted the use of adult stem cells. "This creates ample opportunity to work towards lifesaving cures without crossing core ethical and moral boundaries," he wrote. "We should encourage this science."

In his veto message ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
For now, Daschle concedes defeat on human-cloning bill.(NATION)
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times June 14, 2002 700+ words
...He added that he will leave it to the cloning-bill sponsors "to decide what they want...Brownback's bill and a competing cloning bill that Mr. Daschle favors. But Mr...the outcome." The competing human-cloning bill - sponsored by Democratic Sen. Dianne...
COMMITTEE KILLS ANTI-CLONING BILL \ SPONSOR WILL TRY TO AMEND ANOTHER.(News)
Newspaper article from: The Kentucky Post (Covington, KY) Kinney, Courtney February 20, 2003 700+ words
...House committee Wednesday on a 10-7 vote. But the bill's sponsor said he would try to amend another, less restrictive cloning bill, which is expected to come to a vote in the House today, to include elements of his measure. "I think it's difficult...
Sen. Daschle delays debate on cloning bill until June; Republicans Hatch, Ford...
Newspaper article from: Transplant News May 28, 2002 700+ words
...Societies for Experimental Biology, and the American Society for Cell Biology. Some congressional observers believe no cloning bill can pass both houses of Congress this year. That would mean the cloning of human beings by private companies would be legal...
Cloning bill advanced, pulled back.
Newspaper article from: Omaha World-Herald (Omaha, NE) April 20, 2007 700+ words
Byline: Leslie Reed Apr. 20--LINCOLN -- State Sen. Brad Ashford of Omaha said today that he changed his mind on a controversial bill to ban human cloning because the Legislature doesn't have time this year to fully debate it. In an unusual turn of events, the Judiciary Committee voted Thursday
Cloning Bill Won't Make It To Bush's Desk.
Newspaper article from: Kiplinger Business Forecasts March 21, 2002 700+ words
Byline:Martha Lynn Craver More than seven months after the House of Representatives easily passed a bill to ban human cloning, the Senate is gearing up for an emotional election year debate on the issue. When the dust settles, though, no new law will make it onto the books. While the Senate is
Anti-cloning bill shelved; Republicans divided on stem cell issue.
Newspaper article from: Columbia Daily Tribune (Columbia, MO) April 7, 2005 700+ words
Byline: Josh Flory Apr. 7--JEFFERSON CITY -- Facing strong dissent from his own party, a Republican senator last night shelved a bill to ban human cloning. The bill could come up again, but it was clear from yesterday's five-hour debate that the controversial measure from Sen. Matt Bartle, R-Lee's
BIO Statement: Anti-Cloning Bill Deserves Support.
Press release article from: PR Newswire February 5, 2003 700+ words
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON, Feb. 5 /PRNewswire/ -- Michael Werner, vice president for bioethics at the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), today issued the following statement on the introduction of the Human Cloning Ban and Stem Cell Research Protection Act of 2003: "BIO congratulates
Panel approves ban on cloning; Bill would forbid stem-cell studies.(NATION)
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times February 13, 2003 700+ words
Byline: Amy Fagan, THE WASHINGTON TIMES Legislation to ban human cloning for any purpose, including medical research, was approved yesterday on a party-line vote by the House Judiciary Committee. Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin Republican, said House Republican leaders will
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, Minnesota Gov. Pawlenty Vetoes Pro-Cloning Bill.(Tim Pawlenty vetoes...

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA