AccessMyLibrary : Search Information that Libraries Trust AccessMyLibrary | News, Research, and Information that Libraries Trust

AccessMyLibrary    Browse    H    Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy    Judge Bork, consumer welfare, and antitrust law.

Judge Bork, consumer welfare, and antitrust law.

Publication: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy

Publication Date: 22-MAR-08

Author: Ginsburg, Douglas H.
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.

Bookmark this article

Print this article

Link to this article

Email this article

Digg It!

Add to del.icio.us

RSS

COPYRIGHT 2008 Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 broadly prohibits contracts, combinations, and conspiracies in "restraint of trade" and makes it unlawful "to monopolize" any line of commerce. (1) The open-textured nature of the Act vests the judiciary with considerable responsibility for interpretation. In a 1966 article published in the Journal of Law and Economics, then-Professor Robert H. Bork examined the legislative history of the Act. (2) Bork was candid about the "difficulties inherent in the very concept" of legislative intent. (3) Nevertheless, Bork thought the undertaking was justified by the need to counter the judiciary's repeated invocation of values that were unrelated to the debate that had informed congressional enactment of the Sherman Act and, lacking any legitimate economic rationale, were likely to produce real economic harm.

For example, in Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC, (4) the Supreme Court had counted among the policies underlying the Sherman Act protection of "the freedom of action of [Guild] members [not] to reveal to the Guild the intimate details of their individual affairs." (5) No lesser light than Judge Learned Hand had asserted that the Congress intended the Sherman Act to achieve certain sociopolitical aims, such as minimizing the "helplessness of the individual" (6) and ensuring the "organization of industry in small units." (7) Obviously, such policies are highly malleable; they can be invoked (or not) to justify almost any result in any situation. Indeed, as Bork pointed out, Judge Hand went so far as to state that in enacting the Sherman Act, the Congress had "delegated to the courts the duty of fixing the standard for each case." (8)

Bork's examination of the text and structure of the Sherman Act against the background of preliminary proposals and draft legislation, statements by Senators and Representatives, and...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.


More Articles from Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself.(Book review)
March 22, 2008
Of inkblots and originalism: historical ambiguity and the case of the ...
March 22, 2008
On the hypotheses that lie at the foundations of originalism.
March 22, 2008
The misunderstood relationship between originalism and popular soverei...
March 22, 2008
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God that which is ...
March 22, 2008

What's on AccessMyLibrary?

31,352,044 articles
in the following categories:

Arts, Business, Consumer News, Culture & Society, Education, Government, Personal Interest, Health, News, Science & Technology


© 2008 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning  | All Rights Reserved | About this Service | About The Gale Group, a part of Cengage Learning
                                            Privacy Policy | Site Map | Content Licensing | Contact Us | Link to us
      Other Gale sites: Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever.com | WiseTo Social Issues