AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

My five minutes.(THE RIGHT PERSPECTIVE)

The New American

| March 17, 2008 | Eddlem, Thomas R. | COPYRIGHT 2008 American Opinion Publishing, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

While senators generally have unlimited time for debate, members of the U.S. House of Representatives often have only five minutes to make their point heard before a final vote on important legislation. After the U.S. Senate passed the latest amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on February 12, I thought about what I'd say if I had the chance to speak for five minutes before the assembled U.S. House of Representatives (which was next on the legislative path for the bill). Here's what I'd say:

The pending bill, already passed by the Senate in a 68-29 vote, proposes to allow wiretap searches without warrants or probable cause. What that means in practical terms is that the federal government is going to be tapping the phones of people who are--by definition--probably not committing a crime. They are going to be tapping the phones of people who are probably law-abiding citizens. That's not only a colossal waste of law-enforcement resources and effort, it is also blatantly unconstitutional.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:

 
   The fight of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, 
   papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, 
   shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon 
   probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly 
   describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to 
   be seized. 

The Fourth Amendment sets forth a preamble of how it intends to protect the people from unreasonable searches, and then defines four tests needed for a search by the federal government to be constitutional. One, you need a warrant issued by a court. Two, the warrant needs to be based upon probable cause, meaning that there is more than a 50-percent chance a crime has been committed. Three, the warrant has to be supported by an oath. And finally, the warrant has to state--specifically--what is being searched for.

Those aren't very high hurdles for a search to take place.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
A complicit Congress.(Editorials)(GOP senators enable overreaching White...
Newspaper article from: The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR) March 11, 2006 700+ words
...constitutional protections, the Fourth Amendment. They have crafted a plan...a program that the the White House refuses to fully divulge...allowed to carve up the Fourth Amendment like it was a squab on White House china. The Senate must...
I Know What You Did Last Summer.(United States Congress suspends the Fourth...
Magazine article from: Newsweek Alter, Jonathan August 20, 2007 700+ words
...S. government shredded the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, the one...nonpartisan, went back to the White House and got fresh marching orders...minimum, we have suspended the Fourth Amendment for the time being. Doing so...
Who's listening in on you? Will the Protect America Act provide the means...
Magazine article from: The New American Alston, Wilton D. March 17, 2008 700+ words
...Essentially, the act compels an action and simultaneously removes all responsibility for that action in one fell swoop. The White House, operating under the premise that the original FISA legislation is now out of date, claims that FISA needs changes lest...
EDITORIAL: Reining in White House long overdue.(Editorial)
Newspaper article from: Victoria Advocate (Victoria, TX) July 11, 2006 700+ words
...Constitution itself. The Bush White House claims that the president can ignore...Constitution itself, including the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable...congressional committee that the White House has the power to order the NSA...
White House not aiding volunteer's case.(News)
Newspaper article from: Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO) Imse, Ann January 17, 2006 700+ words
...hired by either the White House or the Justice Department...legal support to the White House. He said he was hired...a volunteer for the White House that day. Gallagher...of their First and Fourth Amendment rights, which guarantee...
WHITE HOUSE AREA DRUG TESTS ALLOWED COURT LETS STAND RULING THAT IT DETERS...
Newspaper article from: Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, WA) March 3, 1998 700+ words
...with access to the White House complex despite arguments...few blocks from the White House, but occasionally...within the secured White House area. The vice president...drug use violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against...
HIGH COURT CLEARS DRUG TESTS JUSTICES LET STAND RULING THAT ALLOWS SCREENING OF...
Newspaper article from: Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO) March 3, 1998 700+ words
...with access to the White House complex despite arguments...few blocks from the White House but occasionally attend...within the secured White House area. The vice president...drug use violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against...
ACLU CALLS WHITE HOUSE INTERNET REPORT A DANGEROUS "WISH LIST".(Government...
Newspaper article from: Online Newsletter April 1, 2000 700+ words
A White House report aimed at blocking...stripping away rights." The White House report is entitled 'The...The complete text of the White House report is available at...to ensure First and Fourth Amendment rights under the U.S...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA