AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
YES
Long-term oral drug treatment for menstrual disorders is hampered by side effects, and the failure of medical therapy is usually considered an indication for surgery--either hysterectomy or endometrial ablation.
In Scandinavia, we have been using the Mirena IUD for at least 15 years. In addition to being a contraceptive, Mirena is an effective nonsurgical treatment for management of menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea, reducing the need for endometrial resection by 60% to 70%.
In a metaanalysis of five randomized, controlled trials comparing Mirena with no treatment, there was a significant reduction in blood loss in patients using Mirena.
In a separate study, Mirena reduced bleeding by 80%-96% over a 12-month period.
Another study comparing Mirena with norethindrone acetate showed that Mirena was significantly more effective in reducing bleeding.
The 3-year follow-up results from a study of 50 patients waiting for a hysterectomy or endometrial resection are also telling. Fifty patients were given Mirena while waiting for surgery, and menstrual blood loss was reduced to acceptable levels in 37 women after 3 months and 4 more women by 6 and 9 months.
Source: HighBeam Research, Does the Mirena IUD eliminate the need for endometrial resection in...