AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 ruling to throw Suzette Kelo out of her home in favor of a private developer (Kelo v. New London) provoked outrage nationwide and launched a national reform effort that has resulted in over 30 states enacting laws and/or constitutional amendments to prevent the eminent-domain abuses symbolized by Kelo.
On November 7, voters in Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, and South Carolina overwhelmingly approved constitutional amendments prohibiting the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private party to another for economic development purposes. In Oregon and Arizona voters passed, by two-thirds majorities, "Kelo-Plus" statutes that both restricted eminent domain for private use as well as "regulatory takings," environmental and zoning regulations that diminish property use and value without ...