AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
"The Wonderful Art of Oz" at The Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art, Amherst, Massachusetts. July 11, 2006--October 22, 2006
William Wallace Denslow's illustrations for The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1900) bleed pictures across full pages and taunt the frame with chiseled, lacy, intervening images. His pen led him, at the turn of the twentieth century, to places other children's illustrators wouldn't go. So did his liking for asymmetry and for the unfettered use of color at a time when the children's genre did less with little.
The sardonic wit of Denslow--a sometime dandy and hard drinker--shod the doleful Tin Woodman with spats (look closely) and gave the important oilcan double duty as a cocktail glass. He was brave enough to make Dorothy, the heroine, appear ugly. He had the gall to compete with the author himself on many a page of Oz, where a curtain of fibrous lines and drenching hues would descend to swaddle L. Frank Baum's words. Denslow may need no defending now, even though for years American librarians caviled at his moral and stylistic license.
In Michael Patrick Hearn's show at the Carle Museum in Amherst, Denslow's pictures remained bold as ever, yet now with strange new bedfellows on hand: Oz disciples, Oz dissenters. Among those, Andy Warhol's 1981 silkscreen mug shot of a ripsnorting Margaret Hamilton as the Wicked Witch of the West from the 1939 movie stood out. With fat black marks Warhol circled and underlined elements of evil on her torrid appearance. Denslow, as well as Baum, was surely capable of that kind of satirical swagger, too. Was the slaying of the witch with a mere pail of water anything more?
Even if Warhol and Denslow may not seem like heaven-sent sidekicks, the show spelled out interesting unforeseen kinships, like theirs. At the same time, it would be fair to say that Oz disciples at times forget that Baum and Denslow's originality came from composing an entirely new kind of fairy tale, as they themselves well knew. In their wake, latter-day fairy tales--and artists--look conventional, sometimes sadly so.
Of that school, Trina Schart Hyman's contemporary illustrations were the most cloyingly limited. ...
Source: HighBeam Research, "The Wonderful Art of Oz".