AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Mr. Kempner is president and chief executive officer of the Mortgage Bankers Association. This viewpoint is an excerpt from a comment letter the MBA sent to the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The text of the full letter can be found on the MBA's website.
The Mortgage Bankers Association is very concerned that some issuers, investors and others believe the guidance in FAS 133, as amended by FAS 155, requires "plain vanilla" pass-through mortgage-backed securities to be evaluated under paragraph 13.b of that statement. MBA believes the application of that paragraph to certain discounted pass-through MBS would have an unexpected, chilling effect on the market by reducing the demand for MBS by investors that do not want to undertake the challenge of having to bifurcate a derivate in some inexplicable way or, alternatively, of recognizing the earnings volatility occasioned by temporary fluctuations in interest rates.
MBA has reviewed FAS 133 and all related literature and believes it supports our position that pass-through MBS are not required to be evaluated under paragraph 13.b for the reasons explained below.
In drafting FAS 133, the board cited "prepayable mortgages" as examples of compound instruments with embedded derivatives that are "clearly and closely related" to their mortgage host contracts. The fact that the board singled out prepayable mortgages for identification and discussion to illustrate the "clearly and closely related" language in FAS 133 suggests that the relationship of the embedded prepayment option and the mortgages is so well established and understood that there would be no need to apply the quantitative tests in paragraph 13 to the instrument to prove the point. Consequently, MBA believes the guidance in paragraph 13, and 13.b in particular, was developed by the board with other hybrid instruments in mind; namely, structured finance transactions involving specifically negotiated terms and conditions designed to appeal to investors' objectives.
By contrast, the prepayment option in mortgages is intended to accommodate borrowers' needs, rather than investors' desires.
MBA believes industry practice reflects a broad based understanding that the embedded prepayment options in loans and MBS meet the "clearly and closely" related test in paragraph 12 without the ...