AccessMyLibrary : Search Information that Libraries Trust AccessMyLibrary | News, Research, and Information that Libraries Trust

AccessMyLibrary    Browse    C    Comparative Drama    Theatre of Chaos: Beyond Absurdism, into Orderly Disorder.(Review)

Theatre of Chaos: Beyond Absurdism, into Orderly Disorder.(Review)

Publication: Comparative Drama

Publication Date: 22-SEP-00

Author: HOEPER, JEFFREY D.
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.

Bookmark this article

Print this article

Link to this article

Email this article

Digg It!

Add to del.icio.us

RSS

COPYRIGHT 2000 www.wmich.edu/compdr

William W. Demastes. Theatre of Chaos: Beyond Absurdism, into Orderly Disorder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. xvii + 190. $59.95

In Theatre of Chaos William W. Demastes has joined the small coterie of contemporary critics attempting to forge ties between modern physics and literary theory. The premise of such studies is that deeply-held paradigms influence the entire culture, governing the way in which both scientists and humanists conduct their inquiries. Demastes attempts to demonstrate that modern drama reflects both the uncertainties of the quantum universe and the structured unpredictability of modern chaos theory.

The book contains five chapters, the first of which is ambitiously subtitled, "The New Science Metaphor and Modern Drama--A Brief History of Western Thought." Demastes believes there is an enduring conflict between two broad world views. The earlier of these recognizes a "necessary interplay between order and disorder" (1). In ancient times this acceptance of chaos was found within Eastern philosophy, Hesiod's Theogony, Dionysian religion, and the writings of Lucretius. These ideas were also implicit in the Romantic revolution and have recently resurfaced in quantum mechanics and chaos theory.

The other basic world view seeks rationality and order while condemning chaos as evil and destructive. Demastes cites Aristotle, Descartes, and Galileo as holding this view, but Newton is the dominant figure. Although Demastes recognizes the importance of Newtonian science, he also finds it sharply limited because of its reliance on "linear thinking" and its presumed antagonism to the broader, more inclusive notions of modern chaos theory. In literary studies Newtonian physics leads toward naturalism, but Demastes makes a convincing case that even Zola "eventually realized the subjective nature of the choices he made" (13), thus anticipating the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.

In chapter 1, "Quantum Physics as Metaphor: Elliptical Beginnings of the New Paradigm," Demastes...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.


What's on AccessMyLibrary?

29,552,473 articles
in the following categories:

Arts, Business, Consumer News, Culture & Society, Education, Government, Personal Interest, Health, News, Science & Technology