AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

A Matter of Trust.

National Right to Life News

| November 01, 2003 | Echevarria, Laura | COPYRIGHT 2003 National Right to Life Committee, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Over the years the public's trust in the "media" has plummeted. Reporters in particular, and news people in general, are widely distrusted.

Why?

In his revealing book, Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, Emmy Award-winner Bernard Goldberg looked at his colleagues and concluded that they "far too often ignored their primary mission: objective, disinterested reporting."

Nowhere is that more true than in the way the news business covers the abortion issue. The distrust that so many people have for the media's handling of abortion is because so much misinformation distributed by pro-abortion groups finds its way into the newsroom and presented as fact. Look no further than the coverage of the ban on partial-birth abortions. Recently, Pamela Brogan, a Gannett News Service reporter, repeated much of the litany of misinformation about partial-abortion and Roe v. Wade that had been discredited in excruciating detail years before. Brogan based her story in its entirety on the campaign of misinformation promoted by pro-abortion groups, which assert that the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act would "ban all abortions in the second trimester." In fact the language is very, very specific and limited to one abortion technique.

In addition to using this incorrect information about the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, Brogan also minimized the impact of Roe v. Wade. Referring to Roe, she wrote, "the decision... said abortion in the first trimester must be left to physicians. The court further said states could regulate or restrict abortions in later stages of pregnancy but must provide an exception for health of the mother."

It is, of course, a gross misconception to suggest that the "right to abortion" that the Supreme Court has enforced under Roe v. Wade is limited in some special way to "the first trimester." Indeed, it is a misconception that has been repeatedly refuted by the Supreme Court itself.

The casual reader would also conclude that there would need to be a serious risk to the mother's health to warrant an "abortion in later stages of pregnancy." But what does "health" mean?

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
ACLJ: Supreme Court Takes ''Significant'' Step in Taking 2nd Case Involving...
Press release article from: Business Wire June 19, 2006 700+ words
...pleased the Supreme Court has decided...partial-birth abortion. The ACLJ...significant. "The Supreme Court took a significant...partial-birth abortion front-and...partial-birth abortion, the Supreme Court puts the...
JUSTICE STEVENS STAYS ENFORCEMENT OF PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION LAWS.(Supreme Court...
Magazine article from: National Right to Life News Andrusko, Dave December 1, 1999 700+ words
...banning partial-birth abortion in Wisconsin and...November 30 when Supreme Court Justice John Paul...s partial-birth abortion bans were unconstitutional...has asked the Supreme Court to review the...intact. Partial-birth abortion litigation ...
Nebraska Defends Partial-Birth Abortion Ban in Supreme Court.(legal cases)
Magazine article from: National Right to Life News May 1, 2000 700+ words
...state's partial-birth abortion ban in oral arguments...before the U.S. Supreme Court. Simon Heller...See also page 2.) Supreme Court proceedings are steeped...many pro-abortion Supreme Court decisions, pro...
Abortion fight coming: Procedure known as partial birth abortion blocked by...
Newspaper article from: Newsday (Melville, NY) April 19, 2007 700+ words
...Wade decision in 1973, the Supreme Court has upheld an abortion restriction...implementation of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 because...some so-called partial birth abortion procedures to be allowed...Does this mean that the Supreme Court is about to ...
ALL Divisions to Protest at Supreme Court - Nebraska Partial Birth Abortion...
Press release article from: PR Newswire April 25, 2000 700+ words
...11 a.m. during the Supreme Court hearing of Stenberg vs. Carhart, the Nebraska Partial Birth Abortion Ban. While the Supreme Court will decide on the constitutionality of a ban on Partial Birth Abortion, ALL and STOPP representative...
ALL Divisions to Protest at Supreme Court Nebraska Partial Birth Abortion...
Press release article from: PR Newswire April 24, 2000 700+ words
...from 8am to 11am during the Supreme Court hearing of Stenberg vs. Carhart, the Nebraska partial birth abortion case. While the Supreme Court will decide on the constitutionality of a partial birth abortion law, ALL's Jim Sedlak...
Supreme Court to Review Second Challenge to Partial-Birth Abortion Ban.
Magazine article from: National Right to Life News June 1, 2006 700+ words
...striking down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, the Supreme Court last month agreed to hear...definition of a partial-birth abortion is so "vague" that abortion...Northern New England, the Supreme Court raised eyebrows by the way...
FRC Plays Role in Key Issues at the Supreme Court, Submits Briefs in Boy Scouts...
Press release article from: PR Newswire April 7, 2000 700+ words
...partial-birth abortion. "We are glad the Supreme Court is hearing...calls on the Supreme Court to uphold...partial-birth abortion ban as a...partial-birth abortion, and it...the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, A Matter of Trust.

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA