AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

UPDATE ON THE UNITED NATIONS AND CLONING.

National Right to Life News

| November 01, 2003 | COPYRIGHT 2003 National Right to Life Committee, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

The substantive debate on cloning which began in the United Nations last year was over whether or not the negotiating mandate should be for a Comprehensive Convention to ban all human cloning or if the negotiating mandate would be for a ban on "live born" cloning only, which would allow the creation and killing of cloned human embryos for research purposes - - in effect, a "clone and kill" Convention.

On November 6, by a close vote of 80-79 with 15 abstentions in the Sixth (legal) Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, a motion was passed for a two-year delay in discussion and action on the parameters of a mandate for the negotiation by a working group that would draft the text for a Convention Banning Human Cloning. This was not a vote on the substance of the debate on human cloning but a procedural vote to delay.

It is sad that action by the United Nations failed to move forward on such an urgent and critical ethical and human rights issue.

The growing consensus for a principled proposal for a total ban was a result of intense efforts led by Costa Rica, the Bush Administration, the Holy See with the assistance of numerous other nations which co-sponsored the proposal, and pro-life Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), including National Right to Life.

The narrowly passed procedural motion for non-action and deferral for two years was proposed by the chair of the 57-member Organization of Islamic States (OIC). In spite of the fact that 16 of its members are co-sponsors of the Costa Rican Resolution for a total ban (12 of the co-sponsors voted against the non-action proposal, three did not vote, and ten other OIC members either did not vote or abstained), the chair of the OIC claimed that this action was a consensus decision by the OIC. All but two of the Arab OIC members voted for the non-action.

In its statement, the OIC emphasized that this motion represented no decision on the substance of the matter, but was an effort to gain more time for Muslim scientific and religious experts to study the issue. The representative of Uganda, ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
The United Nations and human cloning: a debate on hold.
Magazine article from: The Hastings Center Report Walters, LeRoy January 1, 2004 700+ words
...proposed that the United Nations develop an "international...if approved by the United Nations, would announce an...2003, the issue of human cloning came to a head last...resolution, that human cloning "for any purpose...
Triumph in New York; The United Nations Condemns Human Cloning.
Magazine article from: National Right to Life News May 1, 2005 700+ words
...on which the plenary session of the United Nations General Assembly ratified solemnly...called on member states to ban all human cloning. The vote was 84-34, though six...document of the 20th century was the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
US-led campaign to ban all forms of human cloning fails again in the United...
Newspaper article from: Transplant News November 30, 2004 700+ words
...cell research, has been rejected in the United Nations again. While there was almost unanimous...have made in preventing any action by the United Nations that would endorse human cloning in any form," Ereli said.
Human cloning.(United Nations)(Costa Rica's ban on cloning)(Brief Article)
Magazine article from: Catholic Insight February 1, 2005 700+ words
As for human cloning, so far, strong support from the United...countries has supported Costa Rica's ban on human cloning. This raises the strong possibility of a UN-proposed ban on human cloning which would put such countries as Britain...
The United Nations, of all places, might be an ethical step ahead of us on...
Magazine article from: National Review March 14, 2005 700+ words
* The United Nations, of all places, might be an ethical step ahead of us on human cloning. In mid-February, a U.N. panel declared its support for a ban on all forms of human cloning. At around the same time, the president...
UN resolution to ban all human cloning tabled.(Brief Article)
Newspaper article from: Transplant News October 30, 2004 700+ words
...testimony from member nations, the United Nations has once again tabled a resolution to ban all human cloning. The US-led drive to pass a United Nations resolution banning all forms of human cloning-therapeutic and reproductive...
UN delay: a boost for cloning advocates; By putting off a vote on banning all...
Newspaper article from: The Christian Science Monitor October 25, 2004 700+ words
...administration for a total ban on human cloning, last Friday the United Nations deferred a decision...Whether to ban all human cloning or only efforts that...backs a total ban on human cloning. United Nations Secretary-General...
The Clash Over Human Cloning.(Brief Article)
Magazine article from: Current Science, a Weekly Reader publication August 31, 2001 700+ words
...S. states have bans on human cloning, and the federal government...also outlawed some forms of human cloning, and the United Nations recently called for a global ban. Why is human cloning so controversial? Here are...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA