AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The Trials of Masculinity: Policing Sexual Boundaries 1870-1930. By Angus McLaren (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1997. viii plus 307pp. $24.95/cloth).
Another book about the "social construction" of gender--an interesting one. Presiding spirit: Foucault. In the dock: "discourse".
Declaring the turn from nineteenth to twentieth century a time of setting "boundaries" to normative masculinity in the West, historian Angus McLaren has assembled a variety of judicial trials involving men accused of transgressing norms of masculinity. These are grouped under a heading "Legal Discourses: Men, Melodrama and Criminality." Analysis of an array of turn-of-century sexology and psychology follows, subsumed as "Medical Discourses: Weak Men and Perverts.
Assertions of power, in McLaren's reading, these discourses invented--"constructed"--various new negative concepts of manhood, such as the cad, the weakling, the sadist, the exhibitionist, and others, having the effect of narrowing down the boundaries of respectable masculinity. His idea of analyzing courtroom trials, such as an 1895 suit charging fraud against a London matrimonial agency specializing in wantful bachelors, as socially generated "melodramas," leads to a complex and intriguing discussion of the late nineteenth century Victorian marriage market. A lengthy examination of pre-World War I murder trials in British Columbia successfully shows that men who killed in consistency with traditional views of manhood were not seen as murderers at all but as "real men" and, as often as not, acquitted. Several other discussions--of exhibitionism and transvestism in particular--stand on their own as demonstrations of law both reflecting and enforcing larger social prescriptions.
At no point does McLaren claim that any of his courtroom melodramas and sexological discourses are "representative," but he locates all of them within a purportedly central enterprise of anxiety-raddled late Victorian culture: reassertion of the authority of supposedly traditional competitive heterosexual manhood, as against only vaguely identified alternatives emerging in modernizing post-Victorian life. Thus, while the new boundaries constituted in one sense new limitations on men, in a larger far more important sense they sharpened and deepened the hegemony of "real men," and nowhere more strikingly than under the aegis of two ambitious professions, law and medicine, collaborating in the boundary-setting discourses. Just why these two professions so eagerly asserted new powers, and just why discourse on gender served them so well, remains, in McLaren's narrative, cloudy. He might have sharpened his argument on medicine, for instance, by sketching in nineteenth-century doctors' discourse on women, evicting , as they did, midwives from medical practice and ...