Stravinsky: The Rite of Spring. (Book Reviews).

Stravinsky: The Rite of Spring. By Peter Hill. (Cambridge Music Handbooks.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. [x, 170 p. ISBN 0-521-62221-2 (cloth); 0-521-62714-1 (pbk.). $42.95 (cloth); $15.95 (pbk.).]

With this volume, Igor Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring, that landmark of modernism, at last finds its way into the Cambridge Music Handbooks series, which up to now has featured well over a dozen works from the twentieth century. With so much about the work already in print, perhaps the prospect of contributing something fresh-- or even of cogently distilling the existing literature--daunted many writers. Finally stepping up to the task is Peter Hill, editor of The Messiaen Companion (London: Faber and Faber, 1995). Throughout, Hill pays particular attention to the work's dramatic aspects; as he states, "however effective [it is] as a concert item, the form in which it is best known, the Rite was conceived and composed as a ballet" (p. viii). Still, he approaches it from numerous historical and analytical angles, providing a relatively comprehensive manual to the work (and perhaps the lengthiest monograph in the series).

The chapters are grouped into three parts; the first, entitled "Prelude," addresses "the Rite's inception, composition and the steps towards the first performance" (p. viii). In chapter 1, Hill ponders Stravinsky's conflicting accounts of the work's genesis, which vary from claiming that a dramatic scenario evolved first and "was not accompanied by concrete musical ideas" (p. 3, quoted from Stravinsky and Robert Craft, Expositions and Developments [London: Faber and Faber, 1959], 140) to asserting that "the [dramatic] idea came from the music and not the music from the idea" (ibid., quoted from Stravinsky in the Theatre, ed. Minna Lederman [New York: Pellegrini & Cudahy, 1949], 24). Hill substantiates the former view through a focus on Stravinsky's collaborator, Nikolai Roerich, an artist and anthropologist who was "Russia's leading expert in folk art and ancient ritual" (p. 4). A consideration of Roerich's contributions, as the primary author of the plot as well as designer of sets and costumes, is a welcome component, given that some surveys have granted him less attention than he warrants. Chapter 2 is devoted to a study of the musical sketches for the Rite, fortunately available to all in the form of a 1969 facsimile (The Rite of Spring: Sketches, 1911-1913 [London: Boosey & Hawkes]). Hill offers many insights into Stravinsky's compositional procedures, with conjectures tied to details of the plot and the documented compositional chronology. His interpretation of changes made to the ending of the ballet are of particular interest. In chapter 3, he surveys the Rite's rehearsals and first performance. Its riotous premiere is, of course, described; but here the author also considers notable auditions of the work-in-progress, including the composer's initial performances of the score, on the piano, for various colleagues.

The second part, entitled "The Music," encompasses the two longest chapters. In chapter 4, Hill surveys basic components of the music, with sections accorded melody, harmony, and rhythm. In the ...