AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
SYDNEY, Nov 1 Asia Pulse - Evidence obtained at the royal commission into HIH Insurance's spectacular A$5.3 billion (US$2.94 billion) appears to suggest that HIH's auditors were there simply to make sure the published accounts added up.
"There's a general misconception that auditors' responsibilities are to find fraud," ANZ Bank chief executive officer John McFarlane told business leaders this week.
"That is not correct.
"The auditor's responsibility is to give an opinion on the truthfulness and fairness of the accounts."
But what happens when companies run two sets of books and only show the auditors half the story?
How can auditors maintain a regulatory detachment when their former colleagues sit on the board and management of the very company they are supposed to be coolly assessing?
Where is the incentive to stand up to a client's management when auditors' prospects of promotion rest on their ability to drum up more business with that client?
Source: HighBeam Research, DISPUTE OVER AUDITORS' ROLE IN COLLAPSE OF AUSTRALIA'S HIH.