AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

A no-win war without end? By embracing state sponsors of terrorism like Russia and China, our leaders ensure that the "war on terror" will never end in conclusive victory. (Terrorism).

The New American

| October 07, 2002 | Jasper, William F. | COPYRIGHT 2002 American Opinion Publishing, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

America has also accepted a great challenge in the world; to wage a relentless and systematic campaign against global terror.... We are in for a long and difficult war. It will be conducted on many fronts. But as long as it takes, we will prevail.

President George W. Bush

April 30, 2002

In the same April 30th speech in San Jose, California, cited above, President Bush pointed to the early successes in Afghanistan and pledged that "in every cave, in every dark corner of that country, we will hunt down the killers and bring them to justice." Then, throwing down the rhetorical gauntlet to the terrorists and their state sponsors, he repeated a line he had used before: "Across the world, governments have heard this message: you're either with us, or you're with the terrorists." Like many of his similar calls to arms since the 9-11 terrorist attacks on America, this expression of resolute determination resonated with his audience and was greeted with vigorous applause. Americans want the perpetrators of these heinous crimes brought to justice -- dead or alive. It is both a matter of justice and national security that we follow through on this commitment, for those allowed to escape will, almost assuredly, strike again.

But is the Bush administration waging the kind of war on terror that will bring the 9-11 terrorists to justice and destroy the global terror networks at war with America? Unfortunately, it is not. In fact, the current U.S. "war on terror" is on course to become another "no-win" war like the war on poverty, the war on drugs, the war on inflation, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and other failed crusades of previous administrations. The consequences of failure in this case, however, could prove far more catastrophic, both in terms of loss of lives and loss of liberty.

We must not close our eyes to the plain truth in so grave a matter. It is utterly impossible for us to win the war on terror as it currently is being waged. The facts are clear; the president has:

Recruited a posse including the worst terrorist state sponsors. The coalition of "allies" President Bush put together includes Russia and China, who support the terrorist organizations through surrogate states, while continuing to build weapons of mass destruction for Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, and Libya. This is absurd; it is the equivalent of declaring war on organized crime and then inviting the mafia kingpins onto the Police Commission as allies and praising their assistance when they help arrest a few of their own low-level thugs or drug peddlers. Calamity is guaranteed from the start.

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Statement by Charles Showalter, President of AFGE National Homeland Security...
Press release article from: PR Newswire October 18, 2004 700+ words
...President of AFGE National Homeland Security Council: As someone who has worked...personnel to do the job. If President Bush believes that the U.S. is...the AFGE National Homeland Security Council. CONTACT: Eric Shulman of...
Democratic Party of Vietnam Representative Receives Briefing from the White...
Press release article from: Business Wire June 27, 2007 700+ words
...the National Security Council's Dennis Wilder...Minh Triet and President Bush on June 22...briefing and President Bush for his continued...appreciated if President Bush and the National Security Council would move more...
Remarks by President Bush on United Nations Security Council Resolution on...
Press release article from: PR Newswire October 14, 2006 700+ words
...is a transcript of remarks made by President Bush regarding the United Nations Security Council resolution on North Korea: The South...PRESIDENT: Today the United Nations Security Council passed a unanimous resolution, sending...
New US-UN dispute looms on rebuilding of post-war Iraq; President Bush calls...
Newspaper article from: Manila Bulletin April 18, 2003 700+ words
...a direct challenge to the Security Council to set aside its objections...should not be lifted until the Security Council certifies that Iraq is free...mass destruction. "For the Security Council to take this decision, we...
Remarks by President Bush in Photo Opportunity After Meeting with Homeland...
Press release article from: PR Newswire September 19, 2005 700+ words
...following is a transcript of remarks by President Bush in a photo opportunity after meeting with Homeland Security Council: Cabinet Room 10:25 A.M...PRESIDENT: I just met with my Homeland Security Council to discuss ongoing relief efforts...
Democratic Party of Vietnam Representative Visits the White House, National...
Press release article from: Business Wire June 18, 2007 700+ words
...Nguyen Minh Triet's meeting with President Bush on June 22nd, Dr. Nguyen Xuan Ngai...S. State Department officials that President Bush advise President Triet that: 1. Much...Nguyen was assured by everyone that President Bush will discuss improving human rights...
A new way ahead? Iraq.(The UN Security Council's resolution on Iraq)
Magazine article from: The Economist (US) June 12, 2004 700+ words
By winning a resolution in the UN's Security Council, President Bush has given Iraq's new government a fillip...that not much more than a year later the UN Security Council would unanimously endorse America's handover...
U.S. drafts Liberia troop plan; Security Council presentation awaits final Bush...
Newspaper article from: The Washington Times July 17, 2003 700+ words
...United States would introduce in the U.N. Security Council if and when President Bush decides on sending American troops to the...could be tried only by U.S. courts. The Security Council "decides that current or former officials...
For more facts and information, see all results

Source: HighBeam Research, A no-win war without end? By embracing state sponsors of terrorism...

©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA