AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
JOHN B. JUDIS' "NEO-CONS vs. New York Times" [Sept. 23, 2002] has managed to turn Henry Kissinger's position on U.S. action in Iraq upside down. Judis says that the "Times' reporters were correct to include him among the administration's critics" and "if anything" the authors "understate Kissinger's dissent" from administration strategy. But there is nothing "delphic" about Kissinger's position, especially concerning the two most fundamental points in the debate. First, on preemption, Kissinger wrote: "The imminence of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the huge dangers it involves, the rejection of a viable inspection system and the demonstrated hostility of [Saddam] Hussein combine to ...