AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
(From Irish Independent)
Two images on television this week were equally shocking. The first was thecarnage at the Baghdad headquarters of the previously inviolate Red Cross. The second was of George Bush, still mouthing his platitudes about victory against the terrorists.
As a recently-returned aid volunteer in Iraq, I was infinitely saddened by the pictures ofchaos amid the smouldering rubble and collapsing buildings at the Red Cross HQ. It wasa bitter irony that an ambulance packed with explosives blew up the building. In the spaceof just one hour on Monday, four suicide bombers killed 34 people and injured 224 asIraq's guerrilla war entered a chilling new phase.
Sniper shootings, car and even suicide bombings are par for the course. However, to target an international aid agency like the Red Cross takes fighting to a new,unprecedented level. Of all aid agencies in the world including the United Nations, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is synonymous with principles ofimpartiality and independence.
Their dogged neutrality is central to their beliefs and work which does not always makethem popular among the aid community. They have worked in Iraq since 1980 and upuntil Monday, have been untouchable. To choose this particular organisation as alegitimate target sends out a clear message. Any aid agency working in Iraq is fair game.
After the bombings, with the inevitability of a new dawn, President Bush appeared on ourscreen. He said of the bombers: "They hate freedom. They love terror." The naivety with which he views his role in Iraq would almost be touching if it weren't so tragic. What didhe think would happen when his armies succeeded in deposing Saddam?
No weapons of mass destruction have been found and the Senate is breathing down his neck but to admit now to a staggering miscalculation of judgment would be political suicide. Withdrawal doesn't seem to be an option. So much for vanquishing the ghosts of Vietnam and making the old man proud.