AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
David Moskowitz is general counsel for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. This viewpoint is an excerpt from his recent congressional testimony regarding the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Marketplace experience shows that consumers expect the financial services companies they do business with to know about their accounts, to respond quickly to their questions and to advise them about products and services that will help them reach their financial goals. The service consumers expect requires that Wells Fargo have integrated information to give customers what they want - when, where and how they want it. Subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Wells Fargo shares customer information internally to meet these goals.
Providing a new mortgage, refinancing an existing mortgage, meeting our contractual servicing requirements for investors and our customers requires information about their financial affairs. Applying inappropriate restrictions on transfers of information among our affiliates would impede customer service.
The 1996 amendments to the Fair Credit Reporting Act recognize the value to customers of the ability to transfer information among affiliates. This ability is wholly consistent with consumer expectations that their questions will be answered and their needs will be met with a single call or a single e-mail message, whether their financial products are provided by a single company or several companies in the same affiliated group. To put it another way, customers do not care whether for technical, regulatory or management reasons Wells Fargo chooses to organize itself into a particular series of affiliates of a holding company or subsidiaries of one bank. What customers do care about is the seamless delivery of the products Wells Fargo offers regardless of how we choose to distribute them.
To use customer information to provide the same level of service that could be provided by a single entity with the same information about the same customer, a holding company like Wells Fargo that provides services through multiple bank and non- bank charters would have to consolidate its operations into as few charters as legally possible.
Because of the uncertainties of the outcome of the FCRA debate, institutions like Wells Fargo will likely change their corporate structures to reduce the number of separate entities rather than risk restrictions on information sharing among affiliates. It is our view the ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Maintain Uniform Credit Reporting Standards.