AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The New York Times and its supporters insist that the newspaper blurs news and opinion only occasionally. Its critics insist this happens frequently, and could be avoided. So who's right?
One useful indicator is the Times' "Corrections" page during the elections of 2000 and 2002, which reveals a consistent pattern of disfavoring Republicans. Some representative extracts, in the paper's own words:
* "A headline yesterday ... about Gov. George W. Bush's Presidential campaign said in some copies that he had stressed integrity '... Even as Drunken-Driving Arrest Raises Questions of Character.' That phrasing exceeded the facts of the article, and its opinionated tone was unintended." [Nov. 5, 2000]
* "An article ... yesterday reported an assertion that Justice Clarence Thomas ... faced a serious conflict of interest because of his wife's work for the Heritage Foundation.... In its 12th paragraph, the article said [the person] who raised the conflict question was an associate of Vice President Al Gore's family, and the 14th paragraph reported that the Times had been directed to that judge by 'someone in the Gore campaign.' The partisan nature of the source should have been made clear more promptly and reflected in ... the headline." [Dec. 13, 2000]
* "An article ... about the congressional election in New Mexico's Second District referred incompletely to the presence of Hispanic candidates in the campaign for governor.... The Democratic candidate for governor, Bill Richardson, is not the only Hispanic in the race; the Republican candidate, John Sanchez, is another." [Oct. 16, 2002]
* "An article yesterday about a California judge's victory ... making her the first openly gay elected prosecutor in the country, misstated her political affiliation. The judge, Bonnie Dumanis, is a Republican." [Nov. 14, 2002]
* "An article on Thursday about comments on the midterm elections by ... Karl Rove ... misstated the question to which he responded, 'I'm concerned about the 3,000 who died on 9/11.' The questioner had asked whether he was concerned about 200,000 people who she said marched in Washington against a war with ...
Source: HighBeam Research, In media disgrace.(Beat the Press)