AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Following the filing of a class action suit against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and its combination hormone replacement therapy product Prempro, physicians who want to continue prescribing the product and others like it may want to take additional steps to protect themselves from the threat of litigation, one health law attorney recommends.
The law firm of Schiffrin & Barroway, Bala Cynwyd, Pa., filed the suit against Wyeth on July 11 in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.
In a prepared statement, the law Firm said that the complaint seeks to inform the public of increased risk of harm or death with Prempro, establish a fund for the medical monitoring of people taking Prempro, reimburse the money patients have paid for the product, and provide compensation to victims for personal injury or death.
The filing followed an announcement by the National Institutes of Health that it was discontinuing the combination hormone replacement therapy (HRT) arm of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) a large multicenter trial involving thousands of women, after women taking Prempro were found to have an increased risk of invasive breast cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. (See OB, GYN. NEWS, August 1, 2002, p. 1.)
An expedited article written by WHI researchers appeared on the Web site of the Journal of the American Medical Association in tandem with the NIH announcement. The study was subsequently published (JAMA 288 [3]:321-33, 2002).
Wyeth balks at the complaint. "We don't believe that there is any legal or factual basis for the claims against Wyeth," said Natalie de Vane, Wyeth's director of public relations in Philadelphia.
In a prepared statement on the WHI findings, Dr. Victoria Kusiak, Wyeth's vice president of ...