AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Mr. Raines, chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae, spoke recently to the American Enterprise Institute, where he argued that the government-sponsored enterprises are not subsidized by the federal government. This viewpoint is an excerpt of his remarks.
Right now, we are hearing a lot of discussion about the secondary market in Congress as lawmakers consider ways to improve the regulatory oversight of the housing GSEs - an effort we support. As Congress has worked on this issue, however, some - including some at AEI - have sought to broaden the debate, raising fundamental questions about Fannie Mae's role in the housing finance system.
How America finances homeownership is a serious policy issue that requires a serious approach.
In that light, let's look at a few theories being advanced about Fannie Mae.
The first theory is that there is an "implied guarantee" that the government would repay our creditors if we failed.
This theory is perhaps the most fundamental point of departure for many skeptics of Fannie Mae.
Fannie Mae has a federal charter, as do 9,000 other financial institutions. Unlike many of the others, Fannie Mae does not benefit from an explicit government guarantee of our obligations.