AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
In any distressed asset - or any asset at all - lenders and borrowers alike use the term "loan to value," or "LTV." The "V" holds the real mystery here. The mysterious "V" - the true value - is like truth itself. Everyone has his or her own opinion of the truth, just as everyone has his or her own idea of an asset's value. Lenders can end up with a truly distressed asset by calculating an incorrect "V" in their LTV ratio. Entities lending on an asset with too high a loan-to-value ratio, will soon be out of the money. If a lender loans at an LTV of 80%, and the true value of the asset is incorrect, that lender could soon be under water.
Entities that have lent funds on an asset heading into default must first truly understand the asset's value. But they must distinguish between "as is" value vs. potential value. Banks largely focus on "as is" value. If the value is there, the bank will eventually get its money back. If the value is incorrect, the bank takes a loss and hopes to offset it through gains from other transactions.
There's another way. Banks can think like developers when they examine an asset to calculate its true "V." Who's going to buy this property next? Why are they interested? What needs to be done to the property? What will the buyer do with it? Are there risks? What will the buyer make on the purchase?
Buyers of "distressed" assets think like developers, viewing such transactions as money-making opportunities. By leveraging their skills, capital and creativity, they intend to turn a profit. However, lenders usually aren't involved in developing or repositioning real estate. They lack the time and personnel to implement transactions like developers do.
But banks can avoid losses on a bad loan by joining forces with entities that do think like developers, and who can collect defaulted debt and deal with sometimes unscrupulous borrowers.
Many deals went sour in the early 1990s, so some banks adopted this approach by establishing entire units focused on revitalizing distressed assets. Today, defaults are less prevalent. Banks may dispose of only one or two assets per year, which doesn't warrant creation of a dedicated workout team.
Lately, creative bridge equity investors - like Palisades Financial - have adopted a new "value-added" model allowing lenders to share in the upside. ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Distressed Assets And the Mysterious 'V'.(Value)(Column)