AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
(From Reinsurance)
Byline: Simon Kilgour.
Some reinsurers believe the recent downgrades are a reaction to concerns that are industry-wide rather than about individual companies.
It has also been suggested that they are an attempt to counter accusations that the failures of companies such as Independent Insurance took the rating agencies by surprise. The rating agencies' methodologies and reliability are being questioned but, as a rating is no more than an opinion, it is difficult to dispute its validity or sustain a case that it is negligent or defamatory.
Cedants rely on rating agencies in as much as their purchase of reinsurance will be subject to minimum security requirements and because reinsurance contracts often incorporate cancellation clauses triggered when a reinsurer's security rating is downgraded. The failure to downgrade a reinsurer in financial difficulty will mean a cedant retains a reinsurer as security, which may ultimately be unable to pay all its claims. This prompts the question as to whether a cedant can sue a rating agency for any loss it suffers as a result of such failure. For a cedant to bring such an action, it would first have to establish that it was owed a duty of care.
Duty of care
The duty owed to third parties for negligent mis-statements is very limited.