AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
I watched a social studies teacher present a lesson on the Civil War by means of a PowerPoint presentation. Slide by slide flashed on the screen, filled with bulleted lists of information that the teacher read to her students word for word. Students were staring at their handout pages with glassy eyes, lulled into a state of comatose compliance by the thought that all they had to do was study the handout for the test later that week. It strongly reminded me of my eighth-grade history teacher, more years ago than I care to admit, who had a similar teaching style, albeit without the visual component. We would walk into the classroom, sit down, and take out our notebooks. She would start talking and we would write furiously, trying to take down her notes word for word, for we would be expected to regurgitate those facts in the test coming up in the following week.
At least then we had something to do. Between these two eras, a teacher might have written notes on the chalkboard, or later, used overhead transparencies to share information with the class. Chalkboard and overheads had the advantage that teachers could make changes based on student needs and questions. The very features that make PowerPoint easy to use may also limit its versatility. Has the advent of PowerPoint presentations improved instruction in our classrooms? You decide.
A Short History of PowerPoint Use
In the late 1990s, several studies indicated that college students found PowerPoint-based lectures more interesting than traditional lectures (Harknett & Cobane, 1997; Lowry, 1999). Lowry reported that student scores on tests were even improved with PowerPoint lectures as opposed to traditional lectures (51.8% versus 43.5%). Features of the lecture style that students found appealing were the use of a PC (43%), the visual aids (22%), presentation format (16%), lecture structure (16%), and clarity (12%; Lowry).
These researchers also reported that certain elements unique to this kind of lecture presentation appeared to increase interest on the part of students. These elements include the use of color, the line-by-line or concept-by-concept presentation of information, a well-thought-out preorganization, flexibility for adding graphics, and easy variation of size and type of fonts (Harknett & Cobane, 1997; Holzl, 1997; Lowry, 1999). Aly, Elen, and Willems (2004) found that this type of lecture focused attention and reduced distraction, benefiting student learning.