AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
ITEM: The Weekly Standard for October 27 criticized the Bush administration's global-warming policy. Wrote William Pedersen: "The administration's contention that greenhouse science is strong enough to support the current Bush policy, but not strong enough to justify any further efforts, has almost required it to talk out of both sides of its mouth...."
Plainly, it concluded, "the current Bush policy is unsustainable.... Yet a course correction now can head off" this trouble. By simply endorsing the eventual need for a modest mandatory greenhouse control program and beginning to develop it, the administration, at a stroke, with no sacrifice of principle and at modest economic cost, could burnish its credibility on the environment."
BETWEEN THE LINES: President Bush, writes Marlo Lewis of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, "could not propose to regulate ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Cooler heads needed.(Between The Lines)