AccessMyLibrary : Search Information that Libraries Trust AccessMyLibrary | News, Research, and Information that Libraries Trust

AccessMyLibrary    Browse    C    CLIO    In Praise of Poverty: Hannah More Counters Thomas Paine and the Radical Threat.(Book Review)

In Praise of Poverty: Hannah More Counters Thomas Paine and the Radical Threat.(Book Review)

Publication: CLIO

Publication Date: 22-MAR-03

Author: Nardin, Jane
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.

Bookmark this article

Print this article

Link to this article

Email this article

Digg It!

Add to del.icio.us

RSS

COPYRIGHT 2003 Indiana University, Purdue University of Fort Wayne

By Mona Scheuermann. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2002. xiv + 255 pages.

In this study of Hannah More, the popular late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth-century writer of plays, a novel, tracts, conduct books, and poetry, Mona Scheuermann has several aims. First and foremost, she wants to demonstrate that the tracts for the poor which More published during the 1790s had a political purpose: to counter Tom Paine's Rights of Man by showing the poor that their place in the social hierarchy had been assigned to them by God and must be occupied without complaint. Scheuermann's second goal is to show that a repressive or condescending view of the poor was embraced not merely by conservative supporters of "Church and State" like More, but also by members of "the impatient radically-minded industrial bourgeoisie," and to some extent by the most fervent supporters of revolutionary French principles as well (125). Scheuermann's third aim is to prove that More's tracts demonstrate her personal agreement with her contemporary Joseph Townsend, who argues, in A Dissertation on the Poor Laws (1786), that the English Poor Laws, which guaranteed supplemental income for the needy on relatively generous terms, should be repealed, because the safety net they provide encourages laziness and extravagance in their beneficiaries. Scheuermann's fourth goal is to show that More cannot, in any sense, be called a feminist. Her belief in a strictly hierarchical social order was premised, Sckeuermann argues, on the inferiority of women to men, as well as of the poor to the rich.

Scheuermann is, in my opinion, most successful in accomplishing the first of her goals: to show that More's tracts were intended to damp the revolutionary fires that the French example had ignited in England. She devotes a substantial proportion of her study to describing and discussing the political implications of More's tracts for the poor, from the earliest one, Village Politics (1793), which answers Paine directly, to the later tracts of the Cheap Repository (1800) series, which,...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.


More Articles from CLIO
A Queer Chivalry: the Homoerotic Asceticism of Gerard Manley Hopkins.(...
March 22, 2003
The Shattering of the Self: Violence, Subjectivity, and Early Modern T...
March 22, 2003
The Rhetoric of Romantic Prophecy.(Book Review)
March 22, 2003
Alterations of State: Sacred Kingship in the English Reformation.(Book...
March 22, 2003
Storytelling Scotland: a Nation in Narrative.(Book Review)
March 22, 2003

What's on AccessMyLibrary?

31,352,044 articles
in the following categories:

Arts, Business, Consumer News, Culture & Society, Education, Government, Personal Interest, Health, News, Science & Technology


© 2008 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning  | All Rights Reserved | About this Service | About The Gale Group, a part of Cengage Learning
                                            Privacy Policy | Site Map | Content Licensing | Contact Us | Link to us
      Other Gale sites: Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever.com | WiseTo Social Issues