AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Definition
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines embezzlement as the "misappropriation or misapplication of money or property entrusted to one's care, custody, or control. "What distinguishes embezzlement from other types of theft is the violation of financial trust between the owner of the money or property and the offender. Embezzlement laws first emerged in England as a response to the inadequacies of larceny statutes that required that property be taken from another's possession.
Theft by employees is one of the most prevalent and costly problems faced by today's business organizations, either private or public. It includes, but is not limited to, "the removal of products, supplies, materials, funds, data, information, or intellectual property."
How It Happens
The ways that an employee can steal from an organization depends on a number of factors, including the type of money or properties that have been entrusted to the individual, and the access to company funds that the individual might be allowed because of their position. For example, a department store cashier might steal from a cash register, fail to ring up purchases and pocket the money, give purchases to friends and family for considerable discounts, or take merchandise from storage rooms or receiving areas. Other employees with more access within the company might cheat on expense accounts, or misappropriate funds through billing, inventory, or payroll schemes.
While some research has found that theft by employees is typically a solitary event, the influence of co-workers on theft behavior has been shown to have an enormous impact on such deviant behavior. In his classical work on theft, Mars not only shows how the mores of theft are accepted within a particular group, but how the group works together to create a system of theft that is beneficial to the workers and does not hurt the company. A strong argument is also made for the effects of informal sanctions; those that did not comply with the theft culture were often ostracized and pressured to leave the job.
One of the difficulties in developing policy to combat embezzlement and other types of employee theft is that the rationale behind the offenses can vary greatly. While a large number of crimes can be attributed to opportunity or the economic need of the offender, loss incurred through the actions of employees can also be a response to poor working conditions, dissatisfaction with management or compensation, or pressure from co-workers. The subsequent measures that organizations need to take, therefore, include not only deterrence-based security technology, but also a comprehensive program of proactive initiatives to ensure employees are generally satisfied with their environments.