AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
"After all, what really stands out about the ACT [Advanced Cell Technology] study is its fundamental aim. Stem-cell researchers are recognizing the need to find ways of doing their work that do not involve the destruction of human embryos. This is truly a welcome development." -- From "The Real Good News on Stem Cells Beyond the hype, some real hope," by Robert P. George, which appeared August 28 at www.nationalreview.com
"In an effort to correct a misunderstanding about a study that described a way of creating embryonic stem cells while sparing human embryos, officials at the journal Nature said Thursday they plan on changing the paper to make it clearer that all of the embryos used were destroyed." -- From "Journal will clarify human embryo study," Chicago Tribune, September 1.
On the one hand the study produced by Advanced Cell Technology and published August 23 in the online edition of the prestigious publication Nature represented a classic illustration of a press release outpacing what a study actually accomplished. On the other hand, for all its considerable faults, the study implicitly recognizes that it would be good for all parties to the debate if embryonic stem cells could be created without destroying human embryos in the process.
Put another way, it's important that the particular false assertion that made its way into the media stream not override (to quote Prof. Robert George) "the story of emerging techniques to derive embryonic-like stem cells without harming embryos."
For those who haven't had a chance to keep up with the ever-changing picture, Nature produced a news release August 23 to accompany the ACT study that inaccurately stated that human embryonic stem cells had been obtained from human embryos without destroying the embryos in the process. The Washington Post headline was typical: "Stem cells created with no harm to human embryos." In fact, this was blatantly untrue, and Nature corrected the error two days later.
As Prof. George explained, "First, the study did not involve the removal of one cell from an embryo that then continued to develop. Instead, researchers disaggregated 16 living embryos, killing them all, and took an average of six cells from each. The 91 resulting embryonic cells were then placed near one another in dishes and allowed to divide.
"Some divided, while others died, and from the cells ...