AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

Dangerous hide-and-seek with recalled meat.(Viewpoint: the consumers union perspective)

Consumer Reports

| January 01, 2005 | COPYRIGHT 2005 Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Government agencies such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission have the authority to order recalls of toys and other products if they are deemed potentially dangerous. But when meat is infected with E. coli, listeria, or in one instance, mad cow disease, the U.S. Department of Agriculture does not have the authority to order a recall--it can only encourage meat processors to recall their meat voluntarily.

The USDA does not give state officials information about the locations of stores and restaurants that have received recalled meat unless the state agrees to keep the names of the retailers secret from the public. The absurdity of this policy was revealed in January 2004 in California, one of 12 states reported to have signed such a secrecy agreement. The state received a shipment of beef products subject to a voluntary recall because it included meat and bones from a cow that tested positive for mad cow disease. The meat and bones were mixed with 38,000 pounds of other beef and sold in California and five other states.

But while California officials had received that information, California consumers had no way of knowing which grocery stores or restaurants got any of the tainted products, because the state had agreed to keep that information secret.

Thirty-eight states have not signed the USDXs secrecy agreement. As a result, the USDA does not give officials there the names of the retailers in those states that have received the recalled meat.

The policy is not only absurd, but also dangerous. While it appears that there has not yet been a case of a person contracting the human form of mad cow disease from contaminated beef eaten in the U.S., the disease is always fatal. And the USDA typically recovers only about 38 percent of recalled meat, poultry, and egg products.

The government argues that meat processors view the names of retailers as confidential business information and will resist the release of beef recall information unless it is protected from disclosure. But even though California officials were told which retailers had received the recalled beef, consumers were not better protected by the policy. It took 14 days from the time the infected cow was slaughtered for the USDA to issue a voluntary recall, and another week for local ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
USDA Condones Use of Recalled Meat in Processed Food.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News August 2, 2002 700+ words
...company's plans for recalled meat. Cooking recalled meat is common practice...established by the USDA and recommended by...he said. The USDA agrees. "An E...products contain cooked, recalled meat. There is no record...
Rule will provide lists of retail consignees of recalled meat, poultry...
Newspaper article from: Food Chemical News July 21, 2008 700+ words
July 17 (73 FR 40939), USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service issued a final rule amending Freedom of Information regulations in [section]390.10...
Majority of recalled meat not returned to plants. (Washington).(Brief Article)
Magazine article from: The Food Institute Report November 25, 2002 700+ words
...8 million pounds of recalled meat in 2000, the most recent...available, reported USDA's Food Safety and...usually able to take recalled meat products off their shelves...distributors return most recalled meat, said Mr. Baun. Consumers...
Owensboro, Ky.-Area Kroger Supermarkets Pull Recalled Meat Off Shelves.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News August 29, 2001 700+ words
...Aug. 19, 2001, and a label with the USDA establishment number 410. The ground...affected by this recall." Anyone with the recalled meat can return it for a full refund at the...with a sell-by date of Aug. 19 and the USDA 410 identifier, which may have been sold...
ConAgra Plans to Turn Recalled Meat into Non-Food Products.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News August 9, 2002 700+ words
...Denver Post reported last week that the company might send the recalled meat to its cooking operations, where it could have been added...including Colorado, couldn't get the information from the USDA. "As long as the departments have a legitimate health concern...
Colorado Unable to Obtain List of Where Recalled Meat Sold.
Newspaper article from: Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News August 4, 2002 700+ words
...states are in Colorado's shoes. The USDA adopted the rule in April. It went into effect July 31. Previously, the USDA said distribution lists were a business...the health hazards involved. When the USDA proposed the rule in 2000, the meat...
Recalled meat not often recovered.
News wire article from: UPI NewsTrack December 3, 2007 700+ words
...trained products averaged just 20 percent. USDA spokesman Kenneth Petersen says recovery...says the recovery rate is higher when the USDA's own testing results in a meat recall...get consumers to pay more attention, the USDA plans next year to publicize the names...
Recalled meat may have reached Texas grocers.
Newspaper article from: Monitor (McAllen, TX) August 26, 2005 700+ words
...the food-borne illness. The problem was discovered during a USDA food safety assessment that was triggered by an epidemiological...firm is required to notify its customers of the recall, and the USDA audits the process to make sure all are notified. Five-pound...
Only half of recalled meat and poultry is recovered.
Newspaper article from: Health & Medicine Week May 17, 2004 700+ words
...require a company to recall a food product. "Right now, the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) just asks a company if...people might not get the message." But simply allowing the USDA to initiate a recall doesn't go far enough, Hooker said...
Only Half of Recalled Meat, Poultry Is Recovered, Study Finds.
News wire article from: Ascribe Higher Education News Service April 26, 2004 700+ words
...require a company to recall a food product. "Right now, the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) just asks a company if...people might not get the message." But simply allowing the USDA to initiate a recall doesn't go far enough, Hooker said...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA