AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
TUCSON, ARIZ. -- A randomized crossover trial suggests that symptom relief and satisfaction can be obtained by either of two commonly used pessary types, but that patient selection and patience are both key to success.
The multicenter study enrolled 134 women ages 30-89 (mean age 61) with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. They were randomized to be fitted with one of two types of pessary and to wear it, if possible, for 3 months before being switched to the other pessary design for 3 months.
Subjects could discontinue the use of either pessary at any time.
Indeed, only 62 of 134 subjects stayed in the study long enough to complete satisfaction scores on both types of pessaries and of those, just 22 were highly satisfied with both.
"Some could not be fitted. Some didn't like pessaries. Some had had enough of pessaries after one trial.
"The message I got was that pessaries aren't really for everyone. They really are for a subset of patients," said Dr. Geoffrey W. Cundiff, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore.
Surprisingly, younger women were far less likely than their older counterparts to complete the trial comparing a ring pessary with support and a gellhorn pessary, reported Dr. Cundiff at the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons.
Source: HighBeam Research, Patience and patients both key in pessary...