AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF. -- Graft augmentation did not offer additional protection against recurrence in patients undergoing vaginal surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and was linked to an increase in postoperative complications in a review of 312 cases.
Two specialists in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders performed the surgeries over a 5-year period and used their discretion in select cases to add graft augmentation to support the anterior vaginal wall, posterior vaginal wall, or both.
Over a median 9-month follow-up, there were no differences in recurrence of prolapse or incontinence, or in the need for additional surgery between the 32% of patients who received grafts and those women who did not, Babak Vakili, M.D., said during the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons.
Patients receiving graft augmentation had higher rates of postoperative complications, including vaginal or graft infection (18% vs. 5%) and granulation tissue (39% vs. 17%).
As a result, patients with grafts needed more postoperative visits--an average of four visits versus three visits, said Dr. Vakili of Cooper University Hospital, Voorhees, N.J.
The mean length of follow-up was 12 months in the graft group and 15 months in the other patients.
Recurrence rates were similar in both groups. (See accompanying ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Grafts offer no added protection against recurrence in pelvic...