AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
SIR: Since Michael Connor (Bulletin, August 2003) and John Dawson (Quadrant, July-August 2004) challenged Henry Reynolds over terra nullius, the debate has shifted to the relevance of terra nullius to the 1992 Mabo judgment, which found that native title existed in the three Murray Islands off the coast of Papua New Guinea, the largest of which, at 2.8 kilometres, is about the length of Pitt Street between Central Station and Circular Quay.
Former Chief Justice Anthony Mason (Weekend Australian, February 25-26, 2006) insisted that terra nullius "played a very minor role" in Mabo 2. His fellow judges, however, did consider terra nullius an important factor. Mason and McHugh contributed a brief summary and gave their joint support to Justice Brennan who used terra nullius at least twenty-nine times when explaining issues related to sovereignty, common law and Crown ownership. Sir William Deane in "Some Aspects of Daguragu" (1996), wrote: "In the Mabo case in 1992, Australia's highest Court unequivocally concluded that the notion of terra nullius was a travesty of fact and a fallacy of law."
The Murray Islands were not claimed by Captain Cook in 1770 but annexed by Queensland in 1879. Deane and Gaudron in their judgment explained that Mabo proved that: "the lands of this continent were not terra nullius or 'practically unoccupied' in 1778" and they plotted the course of events in Mabo in a sort of knee bone connected to the thigh bone explanation: "Upon the ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Terra nullius.(Letter to the editor)