AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
(From The Lawyer)
David Middleton looks at the inability of the Galileo project's companies to agree on a legal adviser
The biggest project in the European market is proving to be one massive headache for the lawyers. The Galileo satellite navigation project, designed to rival the US global positioning system (GPS) network, is a much-lauded, much-publicised pan-European operation that is meant to be the showcase of EU public and private sector cooperation.
But all it has done so far is highlight the political divisions in Europe, cause delays and bring the project's future into question.
A September deadline has been set for the commercial make-up project documentation to be finalised, but there is plenty of water yet to go under the bridge.
Eight companies make up the combined private sector consortium charged with making the Galileo project a reality. They include Aena (Spain), Alcatel (France), EADS Space Services (France/Germany), Finmeccanica (Italy), Hispasat (Spain/Portugal), Inmarsat (UK), Thales (France) and TeleOp (Germany).
The head lawyers, each charged with protecting their respective company's interests and maximising profitability during the negotiations, include Aena's Jesus Fernandez Rodriguez, Pascal Durand- Barthez of Alcatel, Finmeccanica's Luciano Acciari, Pedro Ramon and Cajal Agueras of Hispasat, Inmarsat's Rupert Pearce and Patrice Durand of Thales.