AccessMyLibrary : Search Information that Libraries Trust AccessMyLibrary | News, Research, and Information that Libraries Trust

AccessMyLibrary    Browse    B    Benefits Law Journal    (Same) sex education.(Massachusetts)

(Same) sex education.(Massachusetts)

Publication: Benefits Law Journal

Publication Date: 22-SEP-04

Author: Morse, David E.
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.

Bookmark this article

Print this article

Link to this article

Email this article

Digg It!

Add to del.icio.us

RSS

COPYRIGHT 2004 Aspen Publishers, Inc.

Determining the marital state of an employee never was much of a challenge for human resource departments. If you produced a marriage certificate from any state or country, you were considered legally wed; if you presented a divorce decree or death certificate, you were officially no longer married. An employee who tied the knot in Texas, Hawaii, or even Brazil and subsequently moved to Rhode Island was no more or less married than before.

In the past year, however, determining whether an employee's significant other is actually his or her "spouse" has become far more complicated. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that starting May 17, 2004, same-sex couples can be legally married in that state--even though the federal Defense of Marriage Act (Public Law 104-199) (DOMA) stipulates that such nuptials are not recognized under federal law. Additionally, some city halls on both coasts have been inspired to start granting same-sex marriage licenses--even though they may be illegal under state law. To top it off, 38 states (at the last count) have laws specifically providing that they will not recognize any same-sex marriage performed in another state.

The constitutionality of both DOMA and those state prohibitions is being challenged in litigation that is certain to reach the Supreme Court but is unlikely to be decided for several years. Putting aside issues of morality--I am speaking strictly as an employee benefits attorney-how can a company decide the rights of an employee's same-sex spouse under a benefit plan until the courts definitively rule whether, in a legal sense, they are really married or not? As things stand, HR administrators need a marriage certificate and a legal...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.


More Articles from Benefits Law Journal
Beware! The plan you thought was a plan may only be a payroll choice.
September 22, 2004
Limiting 401(k) fiduciary exposure after Enron: put your prose to work...
September 22, 2004
Tribute to Michael S. Gordon.(includes 8 testimonials)(Testimonial)
September 22, 2004
FASB changes its position on medical prescription drug subsidy.(Financ...
September 22, 2004
DOL efforts to be more "user-friendly" may increase risk of liability....
September 22, 2004

What's on AccessMyLibrary?

32,075,336 articles
in the following categories:

Arts, Business, Consumer News, Culture & Society, Education, Government, Personal Interest, Health, News, Science & Technology


© 2008 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning  | All Rights Reserved | About this Service | About The Gale Group, a part of Cengage Learning
                                            Privacy Policy | Site Map | Content Licensing | Contact Us | Link to us
      Other Gale sites: Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever.com | WiseTo Social Issues