AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
More Science, Fewer Answers Daniel Sarewitz, "How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse," Environmental Science and Policy, October 2004 (elsevier.com/locate/envsci)
The interplay between science and politics in environmental controversies is a longstanding problem. In issues such as global warming, biotechnology, and wildlife conservation, all sides claim to have "sound science" behind them, and their opponents are called purveyors of "junk science." Arizona State University professor Daniel Sarewitz asks, "If everyone politicizes the science, maybe there is something about science that lends itself to being politicized?"
Sarewitz begins with a thought experiment. Suppose the courts had appointed scientists to determine the result of the Florida recount in November 2000. Theoretically, the case seems perfect for a scientific answer, as what was being sought was a simple set of two numbers. However, different disciplines would have gotten involved, from technologists, to neuroscientists (ballot design and perception problems), to psychologists, and each of these could have ...