Blair's duplicity may be deliberate, or he may just change his mind a lot.(Politics)

Publication: Spectator

Publication Date: 30-OCT-04

Bookmark this article Print this article Link to this article Email this article Digg It! Add to del.icio.us RSS

COPYRIGHT 2004 The Spectator Ltd. (UK)

Very few political decisions achieve nothing but good: one of them was the abolition of exchange controls exactly 25 years ago. This week the Adam Smith Institute rightly marked the anniversary with a dinner at the St Ermin's hotel. Geoffrey Howe, the chancellor who masterminded the stroke, reflected on how monumental the judgment--so obvious in retrospect-appeared at the time. Lord Howe revealed that it was the only occasion in his career that he lost sleep on account of a policy decision, while Margaret Thatcher was all but overcome by last-minute nerves. Nigel Lawson, financial secretary in 1979, used the event to muse on how political judgments are reached. 'It was a leap in the dark,' he remembered. 'We knew that if we had waited for a consensus, nothing would have happened. We had to make the decision, and then build a new consensus around it.'

I reflected on Lord Lawson's remarks after watching poor Tony Blair duck question after question at his monthly...

Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.