|
Why not let the MPs choose their man, then give ordinary Tories the right of veto?(ANOTHER VOICE)
Publication: Spectator Publication Date: 28-MAY-05 Author: Parris, Matthew |
|
|
|
How to access the full article: Free access to all articles is available courtesy of your local library. To access the full article click the "See the full article" button below. You will need your US library barcode or password.
|
|
|
COPYRIGHT 2005 The Spectator Ltd. (UK)
Much nonsense is being written about new ways for the Conservative party to choose its leader. The plan being floated--that MPs might offer constituency chairmen a shortlist to choose from--is absurd. It would have produced lain Duncan Smith. Everybody can guess who the five would be this time, but one or two stand little chance of winning their colleagues' hearts.
No membership rebellion is brewing, but journalists need stories. 'No big problem about change of Tory leadership rules' is not a story; but it is never difficult for a reporter seeking more interesting news to locate a local association chairman here, or an exceptionally zealous activist there, prepared to declare that ordinary members will not give up their powers without a fight.
But they will. They never particularly wanted them in the first place, If the status quo were that the ordinary membership had no role at all in selecting a leader, there would not be a popular movement now to acquire one. Involvement in the selection of leader was thrust...
Read the full article for free courtesy of your local library.
|
|
|
|
 |
| More Articles from Spectator |
Welcome to America.(LETTERS)(Letter to the Editor) June 11, 2005
|
Good value.(LETTERS)(Letter to the Editor) June 11, 2005
|
The evil that men do; fear of witchcraft can lead to great barbarity, ... June 11, 2005
|
The whingers of Oz: Eric Ellis on the weeping, xenophobic hysteria in ... June 11, 2005
|
Mind your language. June 11, 2005
|
 |