AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
ITEM: The New York Times, promoting a new film about "Che" Guevara and his place in history, reported on December 19: "The image of Ernesto Guevara, the Argentine revolutionary who became known as Che and helped Fidel Castro seize control of Cuba in the late 1950s, has inspired countless T-shirts, tattoos, posters, and radical chic berets. Now, the early life of Che, as portrayed in 'The Motorcycle Diaries,' appears to be inspiring South American tourism. Carolyn Midland, 25, was so moved by the film that she quit her job and moved to Buenos Aires."
Earlier, in its September 24 review of the movie, New York Times reviewer A. O. Scott made the movie sound as if it is about nothing more than an exemplary instance of a young man who is in the process of maturing into a politically savvy adult: "'The Motorcycle Diaries' captures, with startling clarity and delicacy,... the quickening of Ernesto's youthful idealism, and the gradual turning of his passionate, literary nature toward an as yet unspecified form of radical commitment."
CORRECTION: That the New York Times would perpetuate the notion of Guevara as a romantic, populist icon is, sadly, in character with the paper that had so much to do with bringing Communism to Cuba in the first place. The grim facts about "Che" are much less pleasant than the rose-colored world painted by propagandists. The real Guevara, who rarely bathed and pushed hatred and class warfare, ran thousands of Cubans through firing squads; though he had no economic training, he was named by Fidel Castro to run Cuba's National Bank; and as head of industrialization after the Communist takeover, Che pushed centralization tactics that drove the economy into the ground.
A short historical review is in order, because the New York Times' omissions are as blatant a distortion of the truth as any outright lies. Indeed, the widely repeated jibe after the Reds took over Cuba was that Castro had gotten his job through the New York Times. This was hardly an exaggeration. As the former U.S. ambassador to Havana, Earl Smith, told a Senate subcommittee: "The United States government agencies and the United States press played a major role in bringing Castro to power. Three front-page articles in the New York Times in early 1957 by the editorialist, Herbert Matthews, served to inflate Castro to world stature and world recognition. Until that time, Castro had been just another bandit in the Oriente mountains of Cuba with a handful of followers who had terrorized the campesinos, that is, the peasants, throughout the countryside."
Matthews, for example, claimed that, "there is no Communism to speak of in Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement"; moreover, readers were told, Fidel's program was "anti-Communist." The New York Times in February 1957 trumpeted ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Travelogue celebrates mass murderer.(Correction, Please!)(Correction...