AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.

BLACKED OUT.(The Talk of the Town)

The New Yorker

| September 27, 2004 | Toobin, Jeffrey | COPYRIGHT 2004 All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of The Condé Nast Publications Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan.  All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

A government censor rarely displays a highly refined sense of irony. Consider the reaction to a lawsuit filed earlier this year by the American Civil Liberties Union to have part of the U.S.A. Patriot Act declared unconstitutional. In Manhattan federal district court, the A.C.L.U. is challenging a provision that allows the F.B.I. to obtain a citizen's personal records--say, which Web sites he visits--without notice to him and without judicial oversight. "The existence of the lawsuit was gagged for nearly a month," Ann Beeson, an A.C.L.U. lawyer on the case, said the other day. "We had to get the Justice Department's approval even to disclose that we had filed the case, and then we had to fight with them over every line in our legal papers. They used a big black Magic Marker to censor stuff on almost every page."

Curiously, one of the passages that the Justice Department censors blacked out, in a letter from the A.C.L.U. to Judge Victor Marrero, was a quotation from a 1972 decision by the United States Supreme Court: "The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect 'domestic security.' Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent." In a case about the abuse of government power, how could the government censor the Supreme Court's warning about the abuse of government power?

Geoffrey Stone, a former dean and provost of the University of Chicago law school, has a theory. "If you look at the whole letter, you see that they probably had some flunky go through and censor every reference to 'security' or 'national security,' " he said. "Government censorship always acts in a way that is risk-averse. It's not that they are bad people. Every incentive they have is to over-censor. If someone under-censors and lets something slip through, his head is in a noose with his bosses." Stone added, "It's just the inevitable craziness of the mind-set of censorship."

Stone has spent the last three years thinking about questions like this one, as he worked on a ...

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
Justice Department takes its fight in Demjanjuk case to Supreme Court
Newspaper article from: Ukrainian Weekly, The Alexandra Frank June 5, 1994 700+ words
...The 06-05-1994 Justice Department takes its fight in Demjanjuk case to Supreme Court. The Justice Department has taken its fight...reacted to the Justice Department's appeal to the Supreme Court by telling the Washington...
Justice Department urges Supreme Court to hear case on pledge.
Newspaper article from: Chicago Tribune (Chicago, IL) April 30, 2003 700+ words
...administration asked the Supreme Court Wednesday to...controversial case, the Justice Department emphasized that...lives," the Justice Department said. "There...nation." The Supreme Court has never directly...character." The Justice Department also noted ...
Microsoft, Justice Department headed for Supreme Court, legal expert says;...
Magazine article from: Network World Fontana, John June 7, 1999 700+ words
...likely to land in the Supreme Court. A hearing before...don't think the Supreme Court will pass up a chance...witnesses. When the Justice Department has finished, Microsoft...expected to be the Justice Department's most significant...
Justice advises Brown bias case go to appeals. (U.S. Justice Department advises...
Magazine article from: Footwear News Gannon, Virginia March 11, 1991 700+ words
...The U.S. Justice Department has advised the U.S. Supreme Court to send a civil...February, the Justice Department said a similar...case by the Supreme Court at this time...premature, the Justice Department said. At issue...
The Burger Course. (Justice Department petitioning the Supreme Court to reverse...
Magazine article from: National Review August 9, 1985 700+ words
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT is now petitioning the Supreme Court to reverse its "historic" 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which made easy abortion the law of the land. It's unlikely that the...
Non-profit hospitals win right to merge; Justice Department decides not to...
Press release article from: PR Newswire April 26, 1990 700+ words
...RIGHT TO MERGE; JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DECIDES NOT TO CHALLENGE...APPEALS COURT LOSS TO SUPREME COURT ROANOKE, Va...The U.S. Justice Department today announced it will not appeal to the Supreme Court the right of two...
The Obama Justice Department filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to let...
Magazine article from: National Review June 22, 2009 700+ words
The Obama Justice Department filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to let stand a ruling that denies 17 Uighurs...trained jihadists' living in their midst. But the Justice Department's brief studiously avoided mention of the immigration...
Free Speech trumps `virtual' child porn; a high-court ruling striking down a...
Magazine article from: Insight on the News O'Meara, Kelly Patricia May 27, 2002 700+ words
...appalled by the revelations of the sexual abuse of children by priests. Then, in the midst of the scandals, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law that banned "virtual" child pornography. An outraged public began asking if the high court had lost...
For more facts and information, see all results
©2009 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
About us | FAQs | Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions
Other Gale sites: Encyclopedia.com | HighBeam Research | Acquire Content | Books & Authors | Goliath | MovieRetriever | Smart QandA