AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. -- Anal sphincter laceration during childbirth is not accurately coded in many hospital discharge records and may be underestimated as a result.
The Pelvic Floor Disorders Network found mistakes in a about one-quarter of 392 hospital discharge records from nine institutions participating in one of its trials, according to a poster presented at the annual meeting of the Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Dr. Linda Brubaker reported an average coding error rate of 24% across the nine centers. Just one institution was free of mistakes. The three highest error rates were 62%, 48.6%, and 27.2%.
Only two patients had codes listed for anal sphincter lacerations that did not occur, said Dr. Brubaker, director of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery at Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Ill. All the other mistakes were omissions of coding for anal sphincter lacerations that had been recorded in clinical records as occurring during delivery.
Dr. Brubaker reported that the coding error rates were not related to the number of deliveries at each institution or to the number of hospital discharge codes for each patient. Women with anal sphincter lacerations tended to have more codes, however, with a range of 2.9-7.8 vs. 2.5-7.2 for women without these injuries.
The network warned that the result of this type of coding error could be a substantial under-assessment of delivery-associated anal sphincter laceration as a maternal morbidity. It recommended against using hospital discharge coding as a source of data.
The discrepancies could have significant implications for quality assurance and research initiatives. Dr. Brubaker told this newspaper subsequently that both the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care ...