AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
A proposal by the Securities and Exchange Commission to overhaul registration and disclosure requirements for asset-backed securities calls for increased disclosures from servicers (as well as from originators, sponsors, trustees and other participants to securitized asset-backed transactions). Although the proposal recognizes the increasingly important role that servicers have come to play in commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions, the disclosures might well complicate things for servicers, in the current environment of multiple parties to a CMBS transaction, without providing any additional useful input to investors. The proposal has drawn comment from a number of industry associations that fear that the changes could have some unintended negative market effects.
In a Federal Register filing, the SEC says change is necessary considering that issuance of ABS has grown from $46.8 billion in 1990 to $416 billion in 2003 and heretofore there have been no specific disclosures geared to the requirements of this investment avenue. The capital markets regulatory agency notes, "Asset-backed securities and ABS issuers differ from corporate securities and operating companies. In offering these securities, there is generally no business or management to describe. Instead, information about the transaction structure and the quality of the asset pool and servicing is often what is most important to investors. Many of the commission's existing disclosure and reporting requirements, which are designed primarily for corporate issuers, do not elicit the information that is relevant for most asset-backed securities transactions."
The Mortgage Bankers Association, the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association, The Bond Market Association and the American Securitization Forum, which describes itself as a forum of TBMA, have all submitted their comments on the proposal.
One concern that the MBA has brought up is that a requirement for a so-called responsible party attestation relating to compliance with specific servicing criteria, which calls for a single party to sign ...
Source: HighBeam Research, SEC Proposal Places Greater Burden on Servicers.