AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
The law firm of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan has noted a new wave of class-action lawsuits under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act alleging that nationwide, minority classes of consumers pay higher overall interest rates than similarly situated non-minority borrowers.
The plaintiffs in the suits do not allege intentional discrimination, according to Stroock, but instead rely upon a controversial legal premise known as "disparate impact" theory.
In an article authored by Stroock attorneys Julia Strickland and Lisa Simonetti, the law firm said the issue of assignee liability under ECOA is a point of contention. Generally, assignees can avoid ...
Source: HighBeam Research, Disparate Impact Theory Is Factor In ECOA Lawsuits.(Equal Credit...